Nikolai Capulet
TNPer
During the case, many events of Govindia's past were brought up, including past disagreements with people in the British Isles and other regions, and Gov's past of sexually harassing female players of NS, most recently was a member of the British Isles, who shall remain anonymous as respect.
In the final verdict, the Supreme Court upheld the Home Office's decision to reject citizenship from Govindia.
The question we have to answer is whether petitioner has given us reason to believe that the Home Office clearly erred in denying his application. We note that Mr. Hanover has not presented any evidence to challenge the government's version of events. Neither Govindia nor..." [Anonymous] "...has been called as a witness; we have instead been asked to dismiss it as irrelevant based on a number of legal arguments which we consider flawed (Mr. Hanover's decisive error is to refer to forum security repeatedly, when the law only mentions security).
Ultimately, the government's position can be summarised as followed: Govindia has a record of harassing people in other regions, in particular the sexual harassment of women. The recent resumption of this against..."
[Anonymous] ..."and his denial of responsibility give strong indications that the behaviour is likely to continue. While the harassment took place on Skype, petitioner has shown in the past that he will do so on the forum as well.
To prevail, petitioner must show that this is clearly wrong. He has not even come close to doing so. Beyond nebulous claims of prejudice, there has been nothing to discredit the government's narrative.
For the above reasons, we rule in favour of the Home Office and uphold the denial of citizenship.
Ultimately, the government's position can be summarised as followed: Govindia has a record of harassing people in other regions, in particular the sexual harassment of women. The recent resumption of this against..."
[Anonymous] ..."and his denial of responsibility give strong indications that the behaviour is likely to continue. While the harassment took place on Skype, petitioner has shown in the past that he will do so on the forum as well.
To prevail, petitioner must show that this is clearly wrong. He has not even come close to doing so. Beyond nebulous claims of prejudice, there has been nothing to discredit the government's narrative.
For the above reasons, we rule in favour of the Home Office and uphold the denial of citizenship.
This reaffirms the Home Office's discretion in approving or denying citizenship applications, and therefore rejects Govindia from holding citizenship to the British Isles
