This is what I'm planning to post in the FOIA thread. I'm happy to take point on moderating this absurdity, if that's cool with you two.
Good to go?
In accordance with Clause 19 of the Freedom of Information Act, Blue Wolf has filed a request with the Court for information pertaining to the Security Council's discussions on the rejections of Madjack and Rach from RA membership.
Information subpoenaed under a Freedom of Information request may only be denied if it meets at least one the following criteria:
1) The release of that information would impair Regional Security;
2) The information does not belong to the Executive Branch
As is laid out in the Constitution, the Vice Delegate is an executive official. Their actions, and the records thereof, accordingly, are not exempted from expectations of transparency.
The Delegate, and any designated executive officials, are ordered to either release the requested information, or to provide evidence to the court that such release would impair Regional Security.
Due to the sometimes sensitive nature of security concerns, the Court is willing to receive and review this evidence in private if the Delegate so requests.
Good to go?