[Private] Grosse's Request for Review of 1.2 and 1.3, etc

[Crushing Our Enemies]

Link: http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7143302/

The court rules say "Standing shall, for the purposes of these rules, be defined as being personally affected by the policy or law currently in effect." I don't think Grosse meets this requirement, as it's pretty clear that he is not personally affected by the list clauses. He's not an ambassador to any regions on the allies list, he's not engaged in any espionage or treason that we know of, and he's not a member or citizen of any region in the list clauses, so their inclusion in the legal code, while it does *concern* him, doesn't personally affect him.

As such, I don't believe he has standing in this matter. I think we ought to dismiss the request. Thoughts?

 

[Flemingovia]

I concur. On the broader issue, I do not believe that the maintenance of lists is equivalent to altering the constitution. So long as the RA has mandated the speaker to keep the list up to date.

A silly non-issue.

 

[Romanoffia]

For the record, I concur.