What do you bring to the bench that your opponents do not? In my opinion, I am very unbiased, which is a skill that many people lack. You see, Iro, I have a hard time making decisions unless I know both sides of the argument, which makes me very skilled at being a justice for The North Pacific.
What types of precedent do you feel is important to consider in Court cases? I think that horizontality should be important in The North Pacific court cases because each case should be acted as though it was being judged by the same justice.
Which candidate do you feel is best for the job besides yourself? I think if I did not get elected as Court Justice, that Cormac should, their platform is fantastic, and they get straight to the point.
What proposals or actions would you take to reform a justice systems that takes our region's brightest legal minds and slowly grinds them into dust? Like I said to Iro, I think there should be a sense of horizontality, which probably would've been a part of my platform, if Justice had an H in it. We need to have our system so each justice was like the one before it. Not exact, but close enough. You know?