Condemn The United Defenders League

[Eluvatar]

NOTING that the United Defenders League (UDL) is supposedly an ideological defender organization committed to the freedom of natives, but that their actions have proved otherwise.

how?

DISAPPOINTED by the actions and contradictions in ideology by their leader The Best Trilogy is Best of Unibot III and its sycophants towards other regions, nations, and fellow defenders.

how?

DISGUSTED by the UDL's attitude towards its former members, and their willingness to do anything to protect their image.

what?

CONCERNED by the UDL's willingness to violate their commitment to the freedom and sovereignty of natives when it suits their needs, and that their commitment to natives is superficial and serves as a means for Unibot to impose their views on the wider world of NationStates.

what? how?

APPALLED by the UDL's interference in The South Pacific Army's (TSPA) peaceful operation in Warzone Airspace, which was motivated by sheer pettiness rather then ideology. TSPA's goal was to maintain stability in the region with a demonstrated willingness to work with the residents of Warzone Airspace.

UDL didn't know, TSP doesn't want this resolution??

DISTURBEDby the UDL's blatant manipulation of regional governments and militaries, specifically in The North Pacific, and The South Pacific.

blatant enough that there is no provided evidence?

TROUBLED by the UDL's continued disrespect and arrogance towards non-UDL defenders, which is destructive to the ideals of defender unity and defender community as a whole.

TITO-FRA historical animosity goes here, etc

Note: ask for second opinion, perhaps from Mall

 

[Mahaj]

I wouldn't ask Mall (raider), but instead ask a neutral.

 

[Eluvatar]

In reviewing this resolution, the Ministry faced the unenviable position of working with remarkably little in the way of facts. Allegations in this matter have been thrown around like water, including, unsurprisingly, allegations of bias on the part of the Ministry, but very little has been demonstrated in any conclusive fashion.

While no proof has been provided of any of the allegations in the actual resolution, it has a remarkable degree of support, so the Ministry will assume that many TNP residents either believe the allegations or believe the UDL should be condemned for other reasons.

The Ministry recommends that: If you believe that the stated reason for a Condemnation need not be the actual reason and that Defending should be condemned, you should vote for. If you believe the allegations are true and do not require proof, you should vote for. If you believe the stated reason for a Condemnation should be the actual reason and the allegations are true and require proof, you should vote to abstain or against. If you believe that either the stated reason for a Condemnation should be the actual reason or that Defending is not condemnable and that the allegations are false, you should vote against.

 

[Eluvatar]

Hello @@NAME@@,
In order to further the World Assembly's mission and better represent what The North Pacific's World Assembly nations intend, The North Pacific has an "Information For Voters" program. As Minister of WA Affairs I am tasked with this endeavor.

Current Resolution at Vote:
Condemn The United Defenders League ( http://www.nationstates.net/page=sc )
http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/6991061

Summary:
This resolution would have the WASC condemn The United Defenders League as proxy for The United Defenders League ( http://s4.zetaboards.com/UDL/ ), alleging the listed causes for condemnation.

Ministry of WA Affairs Review
by Minister [nation=short]Zemnaya Svoboda[/nation] (Eluvatar)
In reviewing this resolution, the Ministry faced the unenviable position of working with remarkably little in the way of facts. Allegations in this matter have been thrown around like water, including, unsurprisingly, allegations of bias on the part of the Ministry, but very little has been demonstrated in any conclusive fashion.

While no proof has been provided of any of the allegations in the actual resolution, it has a remarkable degree of support, so the Ministry will assume that many TNP residents either believe the allegations or believe the UDL should be condemned for other reasons.

The Ministry recommends that: If you believe that the stated reason for a Condemnation need not be the actual reason and that Defending should be condemned, you should vote for. If you believe the allegations are true and do not require proof, you should vote for. If you believe the stated reason for a Condemnation should be the actual reason and the allegations are true and require proof, you should vote to abstain or against. If you believe that either the stated reason for a Condemnation should be the actual reason or that Defending is not condemnable and that the allegations are false, you should vote against.

Administrative Note

As I compose this message, 16 have voted in favor, 13 opposed, and 4 for abstaining on the resolution on our forum so, with neither for nor against having a majority, I have advised the Delegate to abstain.
Forum topic: http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/6991061

If anything about this is confusing or annoying, please be unafraid to ask questions or request that I exempt your nation from receiving Information For Voters messages.

Thank you for reading,
Yours,
~Eluvatar