[Complete]AT VOTE: Liberate Nazi Europe[Archived]

[mcmasterdonia]

This proposal has reached the queue.

Vote: Aye, Nay or Abstain
Disclose: Where else have you voted

Liberate NAZI EUROPE
A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region


Category: Liberation

Nominee (region): NAZI EUROPE

Proposed by: The Dourian Embassy

Description: The Security Council,

Believing that NAZI EUROPE should become open to invasion

Hereby liberates NAZI EUROPE.

Co-Authored by Tim-Opolis.

 

[Blue Wolf II]

For, no other vote but in TNP

 

[Eluvatar]

This is too short

 

[Funkadelia]

Against. I have voted in Taijitu.

 

[Chasmanthe]

Against.

Voting on this just in TNP.

 

[St George]

For!

Voted so far only in TNP.

 

[Lennart]

Nay

Only in TNP

 

[Venico]

For, only voted in TNP so far

 

[Scandigrad]

For.

TNP now, TNP forever.

 

[Cove]

Against. Just here.

 

[mcmasterdonia]

This is now at vote.

I'm counting 4 ayes, 4 nays. ABSTAINING

 

[Thomas Insaniac]

For,

I voted in British Isles.

 

[mcmasterdonia]

Voting For.

 

[Gladio]

Aye

 

[Mahaj]

Fellow members of the North Pacific,

The intent of Liberation resolutions is to open up the region to free the region from a dictatorial government (typically an invader one), when the password has been in place without the natives' consent. This comes from its time and purpose of implementation, the situation in Belgium.

This resolution, however, is different. It opens up the region for invaders, and makes no motion to hide it. Therefore, some things have to be considered by voters:

1. Should Nazi Europe be opened up for invasion against its will?

And, additionally, what precedent this has on future liberation resolution.

The MoWA worries about a situation where a future region, in need of actual help, won't receive the needed liberation resolution because people will point out this one, as why liberations are weak and ineffective. The MoWA sees no benefit from this, and sees future problems.

Additionally: The MoWA believes that all regions deserve self determination, and the right to control their destiny. A good test the MoWA likes to use is to replace the target region with The North Pacific. If the North Pacific could password, and for security reasons did, all voters should ask themselves:

Would you be okay with the password being forcefully removed by your enemies?

If so, a vote for may be logical.
if not, a vote against may be logical.

The MoWA himself encourages nations to vote against, and casts his own vote Against.

 

[Blue Wolf II]

Nazi Europe is an enemy of TNP.

If you're ok with Nazis spamming TNP, vote against this proposal.
If you despise Nazis spamming TNP with their hate filled messages, vote for this motion.

 

[Lennart]

If you think the end justifies the means, then vote for.

 

[Tim]

Nay,
currently only TNP. Shall update if I add others.

 

[Kiwi]

For. I have not voted elsewhere.

Again I find myself agreeing with BW, they are known enemies of the region. This should be a no-brainer.

 

[DRUK]

Aye.

We should be promoting peaceful types of governments to nations oppressed by tyranny.

 

[Funkadelia]

I am disappointed that TNP would approve of such a senseless proposal. Seriously, I totally am for NE being invaded, but not with an awful proposal like this. This is a total joke.

 

[Blue Wolf II]

So its not perfectly written, what does it matter? The effect, if it passes, is the same.

 

[St George]

I agree with the incredibly handsome Blue Wolf II, may he be forever wise.

 

[mcmasterdonia]

Topic moved to WA Archives.

 

[r3naissanc3r]

Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.