Chasmanthe
TNPer
I will try and make this brief and then answer questions if you have them.
I will be sending this out by telegram to as many Nations of the North Pacific as possible, unless the election commissioner says this is not allowed. Although they are not registered to vote on our glorious forum, they will have the same opportunities to question and respond as the members of the community here on forum.thenorthpacific.org
I am running in election for the position of Associate Justice in the Court of The North Pacific. I understand the duties of this office to be the deliberation of criminal and civil cases with the Chief Justice and the other Associate Justice.
Wikipedia says: The word prejudice (or foredeeming) is most often used to refer to preconceived, usually unfavorable, judgments toward people or a person because of gender, social class, age, disability, religion, sexuality, race/ethnicity, language, nationality or other personal characteristics. It can also refer to unfounded beliefs[1] and may include "any unreasonable attitude that is unusually resistant to rational influence."[2] Gordon Allport defined prejudice as a "feeling, favorable or unfavorable, toward a person or thing, prior to, or not based on, actual experience."
My first opponent, Unibot, is a highly decorated player in this game. He has commendation from the World Assembly Security Council. It's certainly one of the reasons I look at when I am trying to decide whether to trust someone. His prejudice is either defenderism, or cosmopolitanism, or both. He has shown on many occasions that he can rise above such ideologies. So can I. My currently favoured ideology is regionalism. I expect my opponent to tell you that I believe there exists some kind of conspiracy against The North Pacific. This is not a platform based on conspiracy theories, because I don't want to insult your intelligence.
Unibot and I have had only one conversation since we've been playing NationStates. He was lobbying for the recall of Delegate Eluvatar, and I conceded that it is impossible to justify a Nay vote on his recall. That is why I did not vote Nay. Unibot told me that I'm a wonderful debater, but this is false: I can't string a rational argument together to save my life.
My only experience of Court cases so far is PMs exchanged with Associate Justice Blue Wolf II, who is also running in this election. The case was Tyler vs Camwood, and I made suggestions to him on how the court could try and hear its first civil case, in order to overcome the perceived obstructions of the Attorney General Grosseschnauzer.
Vote for me. Chasmanthe
I will be sending this out by telegram to as many Nations of the North Pacific as possible, unless the election commissioner says this is not allowed. Although they are not registered to vote on our glorious forum, they will have the same opportunities to question and respond as the members of the community here on forum.thenorthpacific.org
I am running in election for the position of Associate Justice in the Court of The North Pacific. I understand the duties of this office to be the deliberation of criminal and civil cases with the Chief Justice and the other Associate Justice.
Wikipedia says: The word prejudice (or foredeeming) is most often used to refer to preconceived, usually unfavorable, judgments toward people or a person because of gender, social class, age, disability, religion, sexuality, race/ethnicity, language, nationality or other personal characteristics. It can also refer to unfounded beliefs[1] and may include "any unreasonable attitude that is unusually resistant to rational influence."[2] Gordon Allport defined prejudice as a "feeling, favorable or unfavorable, toward a person or thing, prior to, or not based on, actual experience."
My first opponent, Unibot, is a highly decorated player in this game. He has commendation from the World Assembly Security Council. It's certainly one of the reasons I look at when I am trying to decide whether to trust someone. His prejudice is either defenderism, or cosmopolitanism, or both. He has shown on many occasions that he can rise above such ideologies. So can I. My currently favoured ideology is regionalism. I expect my opponent to tell you that I believe there exists some kind of conspiracy against The North Pacific. This is not a platform based on conspiracy theories, because I don't want to insult your intelligence.
Unibot and I have had only one conversation since we've been playing NationStates. He was lobbying for the recall of Delegate Eluvatar, and I conceded that it is impossible to justify a Nay vote on his recall. That is why I did not vote Nay. Unibot told me that I'm a wonderful debater, but this is false: I can't string a rational argument together to save my life.
My only experience of Court cases so far is PMs exchanged with Associate Justice Blue Wolf II, who is also running in this election. The case was Tyler vs Camwood, and I made suggestions to him on how the court could try and hear its first civil case, in order to overcome the perceived obstructions of the Attorney General Grosseschnauzer.
Vote for me. Chasmanthe
