Jurisdiction of the North Pacific

As to question 1, yes, a criminal is a criminal, and if they committed crimes in TNP they should be tried in TNP. As to question 2, embassies are dependent on the region in that if the region considers embassies foreign territory, then they can be tried. If not, then they cannot be tried. Or we could take a different route and assert all embassies are TNP property everywhere.
 
Funkadelia:
As to question 1, yes, a criminal is a criminal, and if they committed crimes in TNP they should be tried in TNP. As to question 2, embassies are dependent on the region in that if the region considers embassies foreign territory, then they can be tried. If not, then they cannot be tried. Or we could take a different route and assert all embassies are TNP property everywhere.
Click to expand...
I agree. I start drafting something.
 
Ruling of the Court of the North Pacific​
In regards to the Judicial Inquiry filed by Abbey on the Jurisdiction of the Court​

The Court took into consideration the Inquiry filed here by Abbey.

The Court opines the following in response to the quests posed:

1. Can a nation be prosecuted for anything other than Treason (as specified in http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/single/?p=8055484&t=6927180 ) if they are no longer residing in the region? This specifically relates to -T-h-o-r- and treetar.
Click to expand...

Yes any nation may be prosecuted for crimes other than Treason. The Courts ruling that was linked was specifically speaking of just Treason while other crimes may be tried as well. If the nation committed a crime or is expected of committing a crime in the North Pacific they may be tired even if their nation no longer resides in the North Pacific.

2. On a similar vein, can a nation be prosecuted for anything other than Treason for offences which were not commited within property of TNP or an ally, such as a forum embassy of ours located on a different region’s offsite forums?
Click to expand...

This depends on the region in which the crime was committed in. If the region we hold an embassy with considers said Embassy as our property the answer would be yes they can be tried here. Whether or not the North Pacific considers all Embassies property of the North Pacific is not determined and the Court directs you towards the Assembly for discussion of that matter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top