unibot
TNPer
Informational Review by the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs::
This is an informational review of the SC Resolution-At-Vote, “Liberate Benevolent Capitalism"” published by The North Pacific's Ministry of World Assembly Affairs for your convenience and consideration.
In "Liberate Benevolent Capitalism", we have a standard liberation scenario. A raiding group called "Pwnzoria", took the region only a short time ago and quickly used influence to implement a password and begin banning and ejecting natives out of the region against their will.
According to Pwnzoria, the motivation behind the raid is pretty clear,
"My point exactly,we need to build Pwnzoria's reputation. Also if someone here could follow our progress please? We intend to build enough support for a condemnation. (Including evidence of our suitably nefarious actions, although this does not necessitate that these actions will be dishonest, just evil)" ~ Hoteldematagigantes, June 26, 2012.
Pwnzoria's motivation for raiding Benevolent Capitalism is thus to foster interregional infamy for itself.
As with most liberations, much attention by critics of the liberation has been brought to (1) the lack of expressed native support for the liberation, (2) the characteristics of "Benevolent Capitalism" before the raid. Generally, natives do not view the official forums without being explicitly asked to join the forums; so, imaginably, a great deal of running a successful WA Liberation is in the ability of the author to direct natives to the thread where they can announce their support of the liberation. At this time, Nautican and Flaxxony-Setram have joined the official forum's thread in support of the liberation; I have no reason to expect that this will be the end of the emergent native support for the World Assembly initiative.
Likewise, critics will also often argue that Benevolent Capitalism was a relatively small region before the raid; one critic suggested that a region was only "worth" a liberation if there were at least six natives to support said initiative. However, these claims were countered by Topid (well renowned WA Security Council author), who suggested that even small regions deserve to be free from forced impositions against their region's will. Ultimately, there are at least two important questions for you to ask yourself: (1) is native support for a WA Liberation important for you when it comes to deciding whether to vote yea or nay on said liberation? If so, is there enough native support to permit this liberation? (2) Is this region "worth" a liberation?
Bearing these thoughts in mind, The Ministry of World Assembly Affairs believes that the native support level for "Liberate Benevolent Capitalism" is not unusual (two or three natives voicing their opinion is common for smaller regions in my experience) and that the size of Benevolent Capitalism is inconsquential. Additionally, we believe that the North Pacific Army (NPA) may find a liberated Benevolent Capitalism to be a wonderful opportunity to organize a counter-invasion -- but on that note, we must defer to the central command of the NPA. We hope that with the password down, the region will hopefully be free soon from foreign occupation and once again have an opportunity to develop.
The Ministry of World Assembly Affairs has (1) thus recommended that the delegate vote "FOR" Liberate Benevolent, and (2) calls upon all member-states in The North Pacific (that's you!) to carefully consider the viewpoints expressed in this informational statement. Thank you.
Yours,
Unibot
Minister of World Assembly Affairs in The North Pacific.
This one was easier to write a statement for when I had to choose between the upcoming SC and GA votes, but I didn't get to writing a statement for the GA resolution yet and I will be at work during the day. (If Elu is interested, I will vote yea on both the upcoming GA and SC votes).
