AT VOTE: Intangible Cultural Heritage [Complete] [Complete]

[Eluvatar]

Category: Education and Creativity
Area of Effect: Cultural Heritage
Proposed by: Ile Royale

Description: The General Assembly,

NOTING the protection afforded to culturally significant artefacts by General Assembly Resolution 72;

RECOGNISING that there are many non-material aspects of culture not protected or preserved by that resolution;

DEFINING an intangible cultural heritage as a custom, practice, tradition or skill, and all locations and objects associated therewith, which is considered to be a part of the cultural heritage of a community, group or society by members of that community, group or society;

MANDATES that the Intangible Cultural Heritage Commission (ICHC) be established to categorise and record intangible cultural heritage;

ORDERS member states to assist the ICHC in its task by providing detailed and useful information regarding intangible cultural heritage within their territories;

REQUIRES member states to:

• adopt a general policy for the protection of intangible cultural heritage.
  
• criminalise any deliberate action which has the consequence of destroying an intangible cultural heritage by any means.

AFFIRMS the right of member states to restrict cultural practices that may cause harm to national populations, provided that academic information regarding these practices is recorded and submitted to the ICHC.

ENCOURAGES member states to institute policy aimed at training specialists with the necessary knowledge to protect and record intangible cultural heritage;

CALLS UPON member states to provide for education regarding intangible cultural heritage.

 

[Eluvatar]

Hello again! I've just submitted a WA proposal, so here is my copy and pasted spiel

Dear Delegate,
I am writing to you concerning my General Assembly proposal, Intangible Cultural Heritage protection. This resolution would help to better protect an area of culture that is just as important as material objects, but is currently lacking the same secure status in international law.

I ask that you approve the proposal by going to Intangible Cultural Heritage then clicking "Approve this Proposal". If you have any questions regarding my proposal please don't hesitate to send me a TG and I'll do my best to answer them.

Yours Sincerely,
Ile Royale

Ile Royale (Aegara) has stated they will come here to provide further explanations "if needs be".

NB: The first line of the telegram is presumably because we have previously corresponded on other matters.

 

[Ravenna]

I'm for this

 

[Haor Chall]

Gods, no.

 

[Funkadelia]

I support this. The author was careful and thorough when writing this and it stands for a good and feasible cause.

 

[Eluvatar]

I expect this to come to a vote in 50 hours.

 

[Eluvatar]

This will come to a vote in 2 hours.

 

[Zemnaya Svoboda]

I count 3 aye 1 against, and will vote For.

Does anyone want to write up summarized arguments for and against?

 

[Zemnaya Svoboda]

Was first to vote.

 

[Cove]

For.

 

[Zemnaya Svoboda]

Thanks for that!Here's my summary in favour:The protection for physical sites and monuments has been enshrined in WA law for a long time now, yet this protection does not currently extend to the many non-physical aspects of culture such as language and national customs. These are as important, if not more important than the monuments already protected; languages, for example, are the most basic expression of a common culture.This resolution will preserve these aspects of culture, as well as locations and objects associated with them, through clauses which would require member states to criminalise the destruction of intangible cultural heritages. In addition to this, the resolution would also preserve academic information regarding these important parts of cultural heritage.

 

[unibot]

AFFIRMS the right of member states to restrict cultural practices that may cause harm to national populations, provided that academic information regarding these practices is recorded and submitted to the ICHC.

I'm worried this is too limited; a custom may be unethical and cruel to animals (not "national populations) or environmentally unethical but not harmful for people in the environment.

 

[Eluvatar]

Intangible Cultural Heritage was passed 7,029 votes to 3,120.

 

[Eluvatar]

Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.

 

[r3naissanc3r]

Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.