- TNP Nation
- Blue_Wolf_II
Your endorsements are a bit low.Great Bights Mum:
Eluedit: added in quote for to split
Re: GBM applies to join SC
- Thread starter Blue Wolf II
- Start date
Eluedit: added in quote for to split
- Pronouns
- he/him/his
- TNP Nation
- Zemnaya Svoboda
- Discord
- Eluvatar#8517
Legal minimum is 50.Blue Wolf II:Your endorsements are a bit low.
- TNP Nation
- Blue_Wolf_II
To maintain membership, yes, but according to Grosse in the thread you just moved this post from, the requirement for entry is 50% of the delegates current count, so 155 endorsements at current. That is, of course, if his claim is true.
- Pronouns
- he/him/his
- TNP Nation
- Zemnaya Svoboda
- Discord
- Eluvatar#8517
Good point. Fixed.Blue Wolf II:
Grosseschnauzer
TNPer
The opening post in the new thread was taken from the opening post of the original application thread. (The only addition was the informal guidance as to how to state the application.)
The current law is 50 or 50 per cent. And in any event, the law also changed as to 'applicants" who have previously been elected to and served on the Security Council, and who became inactive. The original law "removed" them, and that terminology was changed to "suspended" when the last major revision was past in the northern hemisphere winter of 2010-11.
The current law is 50 or 50 per cent. And in any event, the law also changed as to 'applicants" who have previously been elected to and served on the Security Council, and who became inactive. The original law "removed" them, and that terminology was changed to "suspended" when the last major revision was past in the northern hemisphere winter of 2010-11.
Romanoffia
Garde à l'eau!
But that only applies if they like you and find you sufficiently in compliance with the unholy alliance of the elite and powerful. You should know that, BW. [/sarcasm and parody]. 
Grosseschnauzer
TNPer
Roman, oddly enough I had to check seniority dates, and I had forgotten that the R.A. rejected your first application to join the Security Council a year or so ago.
It's in the R.A. archives if you want to double check that vote. But harping about this is not going to do you any good in the long term.
It's in the R.A. archives if you want to double check that vote. But harping about this is not going to do you any good in the long term.
This thread has been declassified for public viewing by the Vice Delegate. If you have any questions, please contact the Vice Delegate for more information.