TNP v JAL Inquiry

[Eluvatar]

The office of the Attorney General hereby requests that the prosecutor of TNP v. JAL demonstrate their continued ability to prosecute the case or surrender it forthwith.

 

[Eluvatar]

The prosecution of TNP v JAL reports that it is entirely prepared to continue this trial should it be necessary.

The arguments the prosecution has prepared are just as solid as they were several months ago. The prosecution is present.

The prosecution does ask the office of the Attorney General whether the case has been dropped by the Delegate or that is not a legal procedure.

 

[Eluvatar]

The Attorney General's office has received the prosecution's request and will be filing a request for judicial review. Thank you for your prompt response to this office's inquiry.

 

[Blue Wolf II]

Enjoy talking to yourself?

 

[Eluvatar]

I don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Grosseschnauzer]

As an observer, I would ask that the prosecutor seek review by the Court of the procedures followed in this case that have been contrary to the Court's own rules, as well as the Constitution (one judge versus three judges) and the procedures requiring all evidence and testimony to be prepared prior to the start of the trial hearing. I raise this only as a potential amicus curiae (friend of the Court.)
It is my contention that had those rules been followed as adopted, the trial would have been completed long ago with a verdict, and if the Court were to choose a mistrial and start a new trial, there is simply no reason why the retrial would take very long, since both parties have had witnesses called and testimony recorded.

 

[Flemingovia]

no. Dear God no. Under no circumstances must we start this mess all over again. Understand me? it. must. never. be. allowed. to. happen.

Isn't it enough to you that the Attorney general is talking to a past incarnation of himself AND ANSWERING BACK? See what you have driven him to?

 

[Govindia]

Enjoy talking to yourself?