Felasia for Delegate

Felasia

Felasia

TNPer
Interestingly, the last time I wrote this I actually lose to someone who didn't write one. So I'm a bit skeptical if this is going to work in my favor or not. Still, I figure I might as well give this another shot. Also, if any of what is written doesn't make sense, it's definitely my fault.

This is a couple of stuffs that I want to do if I'm elected.

  • Enhance regional security and encourage the participation of new players by exchanging endorsements with and extending an invitation to every nations in the region. I also plan to established an endorsement cap. Additionally, I will also ban all ad-spammers who don't follow the guideline in addition to suppressing their ad as well.
  • Establish a military force. I think one of the reason that we fail to attract new player is a lack of other activities beside spamming and regional assembly debate. This army will probably be a raider army since raider took initiative in the situation and it is far easier for smaller and new army to be the one that take the region then the one that try to defense or take it back. The main thing about this army that will differ from the NPA is it must actually do something and publish it's victory.
  • Role Playing and Map. I am absolutely clueless whether TNP actually wants to have a role-playing or not, but it's one of the activity that new player and I think it's important that we give them the opportunities so I plan to have a poll (Yes, another poll :P) about whether anyone is interest in RP and what kind of theme they want.
  • Diplomatic Corp, also something to work on. I plan to close all inactive embassy except for feeders and sinkers. I don't plan to release a weekly or monthly update, but will only release news of our events or activities when we actually have something.

I'd like to take a moment to thank everyone running for these various positions available in the upcoming General Election and wishes them the best of luck.

Thank you for taking some time off to read this, it must be pretty boring if you are actually reading this. :P
 
Establish a military force. I think one of the reason that we fail to attract new player is a lack of other activities beside spamming and regional assembly debate. This army will probably be a raider army since raider took initiative in the situation and it is far easier for smaller and new army to be the one that take the region then the one that try to defense or take it back. The main thing about this army that will differ from the NPA is it must actually do something and publish it's victory.
Click to expand...

Why turn raider? Some defenders may have issue with this.

Role Playing and Map. I am absolutely clueless whether TNP actually wants to have a role-playing or not, but it's one of the activity that new player and I think it's important that we give them the opportunities so I plan to have a poll (Yes, another poll :P) about whether anyone is interest in RP and what kind of theme they want.
Click to expand...

People's views of RP are different. Some like character based, some like nation-based (like myself).
 
Why turn raider? Some defenders may have issue with this.
Click to expand...

Defenders needs to aligned itself with other defenders for them to be an effective army against raider. They also have to watch for update time and needs a lot of updaters for them to be effective. Raiders have far more freedom to operate, can also use sleeper as oppose to the needs for updaters to take a region and is far easier to work with in comparison to some defender region. It is also my hope that this move will give a more neutral stand to TNP as oppose to heavily leaning in the defender camp as it had been in the past.

It is far more complicated to be a defender then a raider.

As to defenders having issue, I do not oppose to the idea of another defender army much like TWP in the past, but at this moment I believe that one military will be hard enough to create with the current level of activity in TNP. Citizens of the region who are defenders or wants to create a defender army are welcomed to discuss this with me if I'm actually elected, I will provide equal assistance in recruitment to this defender army.

People's views of RP are different. Some like character based, some like nation-based (like myself).
Click to expand...

As I have stated, I will probably needs a poll for this. Or if everyone wants to let the rest of the region know what they want here then that is fine by me as well.
 
Well, I have to said that I should have learn not to bother writing this thing cause nobody actually want to read it.

Still though, I better complete my "democratic duty" by asking if anyone have any questions or concern or just want to said something then feel free to PM me or post it here. I'm pretty sure I will response... probably.
 
You've got 55 views so someone's been checking this out. I read it. Liked some of it, didn't like other parts but I will commend you for at least making some effort to run a campaign.
 
Well, it looks like the region is going to elect a WA Delegate who, not only didn't campaign at all, but whose WA nation is in Balder. Well done TNP.
 
Also a person who, as Vice Delegate of TNP, defeated and banned Durka II without the outside assistance of a major raider/defender group. ;)

Clearly that man, whomever he may be, is under-qualified and doesn't care about TNP.
 
Calm down, guys. :P

If this other awesome former Vice Del win, I'm sure it's because TNP think he is the best choice. I will be disappointed that what I have done for TNP during the year is clearly not enough to persuade these nations to vote for me, but it's democracy.

Although if that actually happen, I do hope that this Vice Del will consider my proposal that we raid every region that put ad-spam on our RMB! XD
 
Blackshear:
Well, it looks like the region is going to elect a WA Delegate who, not only didn't campaign at all, but whose WA nation is in Balder. Well done TNP.
Click to expand...
uh...who? Felasia or BW?
 
Laughs the man who banned thousands of nations from TNP as Durka, was deleted, came back with Durka II, was allowed to become delegate again, and then banned thousands of nations from TNP. :P

You should know better JAL, The North Pacific is an odd place.
 
Govindia:
Blackshear:
Well, it looks like the region is going to elect a WA Delegate who, not only didn't campaign at all, but whose WA nation is in Balder. Well done TNP.
Click to expand...
uh...who? Felasia or BW?
Click to expand...
Seeing as you asked this in Felasia's campaign thread, the answer should be obvious. It should also be obvious who is winning the election at this point. Oh yeah, Felasia is also the Vice Delegate of TNP with the second most endorsements in the region, something that would be hard to do if his WA nation was in Balder.
 
It's quite amazing how TNP seems to have so many RA member right now when only a few days ago there is nobody around.
 
Its typical of TNP. I remember when ADN was still around their members who held duel citizenship would never log on except at election time to post their vote for the ADN's preferred candidate before slipping back into inactivity.

Its tradition, you see. :P
 
Jeux II:
What are your views on the MPA?
Click to expand...

I have seen far too many of these feeder alliances (all of which failed) to be especially optimistic about MPA. If I recall correctly, the last one TNP was involved in was the Azure Articles of Alliance between Pacifica, TSP, and Taijitu, which was an abysmal failure. Indeed I recall signing Lazarus into one of these feeder alliance super-pacts back when I was King over there. Pacifica was the one who set the thing up and it seemed to have failed the second everyone put their names on it. It says something when Lazarus, of all regions, is the most active member of any alliance.

I have no problem with alliances in general but I do have a problem with feeder alliances, particularly Feeder Pacts. The problem, as I see it, is that no one has a proper military anymore. Whats the point if when an ally has a coup (like we did in TNP under Azure) no member of the alliance comes to help because they have no military to send.

I recently objected to the Sinker Pact that just got signed between TRR, Laz, Osiris, and Balder because TRR Delegate at the time, Guy, specifically stated that he wouldn't form a regional military for the purposes of supporting the alliance. Instead he fully expected the other regions to come to the aid of TRR without ever having to send support should any of the other Sinkers come under attack. That sort of attitude helps no one and is more or less going to make that particular Pact completely useless in the long run due to other regions adopting the same viewpoint, that its "someone else's problem" and they can reap all the benefits of an Alliance without bringing anything into the pot.

Frankly, I would rather see us in alliances between userite regions like, and I know this is probably a bad example, the Lion Star Pact that TNP had with the RLA. Userites have militaries and are whores for attention. Much like Gatesville when it was defending, not invading, feeder regions, these regions will be willing to come to our aid just for the publicity it brings them and the prestige of being associated with a Feeder. Plus we really aren't expected to give anything in return, and userite regions understand that. To most userites a "feeder military" like Pacifica's Pacific Army, TNP's NPA, or TWP's WPLF/BSS is a myth, something that happened so long ago its not even worth remembering.

To be perfectly honest with you, if we ever get attacked or have a rogue delegate, you're going to see our outside support come from regions like Skyrim or Taijitu long before it comes from our brother and sister Feeders.
 
Hijacking this thread already? :P

Anyway, I tends to agree with what had already been said above. In my opinion, feeders cooperation only works in area that is unrelated to military such as cultural (joint events) or foreign cooperation and even then it usually only work when the government that sign an agreement remains in office. Military cooperation works only when each region is committed to the principle of mutual defense and actually have active military force to enforce the agreement; both doesn't usually exist in feeder.

I'm all for feeder cooperation, but it's unlikely that TNP will gain much from this kind of agreement until each feeder actually have an army.
 
Now that this topic has already been Hijacked Just wanted to say My Plan is to increase the size of Security council and Bring In new members with the help of new delegate.
 
In my opinion, feeders cooperation only works in area that is unrelated to military such as cultural (joint events) or foreign cooperation and even then it usually only work when the government that sign an agreement remains in office
Click to expand...

The MPA has nothing to do with military.
Here is the treaty: Here
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top