Request for Clarification

Abstain

TNPer
As my application to the RA is nearing 14 days old without an acceptance or denial I'd like the court to explain the following:

Law 28:
2. The Speaker or assigned deputy, shall respond to applicant requests within 14 days. Failure to respond to the applicant within the specified period will result in automatic admittance of the applicant to the Assembly.

What is considered "responding to an applicant? In my case, the speaker has posted in the designated thread that my application is currently under review, but is this considered responding?

Is responding a post stating whether an application is accepted or denied, or is it a post or private message stating that the application has been noticed? If in the case of the latter, using the wording of the law at face value, this opens the potential issue of abuse whereas a speaker can state they have seen the application and then leave an applicant in limbo by having responded to them but not actually accepting or denying the application so that they do not automatically become a member of the RA.
 
I would like to apologize for the lateness on getting to this, but the situation is rather complicated.

The answer to your application is sent to you though PM.
 
in the interests of transparency in government, might one ask what the end result of this was?

I ask for historical reasons, since I was admin at the time of the original ban.
 
Flem, We're still waiting to hear from Limi as to what case he wishes to present to support any change. He's beenadvised that he needs to focus the application on showing good grounds based on how he's acted since the ban was imposed, we are not going to review the ban or the reasons for it again.

That review will be handled through the forum moderation team as a group, as was the upgrade to a permanent ban following the document attempt showing an evasion of the original ban.

My term on the Court will likely end today with the closing of the special election for a new Vice Delegate, and the voting should open momentariy for elections for the next Court.
 
Back
Top