Security Council Votes

Eluvatar

Eluvatar

TNPer
-
-
Pronouns
he/him/his
TNP Nation
Zemnaya Svoboda
Discord
Eluvatar#8517
The Security Council has voted 0:0, with Chairman Eluvatar breaking the tie in favor of finding Eluvatar to not be a Security Risk to the North Pacific. Eluvatar is hereby admitted to the Security Council.
 
Acting in accordance with constitution of The North Pacific's ;
Section 2: Powers

2. The Vice Delegate as President of the Council shall keep record of members of the Council and Auxiliary and remove members if empowered to do so by law.
Click to expand...

and The North Pacific Legal Code;
TNP LAW 30
The Security Council Regulation Act

Section One: Requirements

2. Members of the Council shall maintain at least 130 endorsements and no more than 180.
Click to expand...

in my capacity as President of the council hereby remove Eluvatar from the council, as his nation of Zemnaya Svoboda has fallen under the required endorsement count, with 110 endorsements.
 
In my capacity as President of the Council, in absense of any other members, hereby accept Tresville (Handshaker, 161 endorsements as of time of posting) into the Security Council.
 
Eluvatar:
The Security Council has voted 0:0, with Chairman Eluvatar breaking the tie in favor of finding Eluvatar to not be a Security Risk to the North Pacific. Eluvatar is hereby admitted to the Security Council.
Click to expand...
:rofl: Awesome!

And thanks for letting me in.
 
It is official. By a vote of 2-0, the sitting members of the Security Council have accepted Grosseschnauzer into the ranks of the Security Council.

Congratulations, GS.
 
With 2 out of a possible 3 votes each, The Sneaky Antics of Moany Old Gits and The Salty Dogs of Great Bights Mum have both been accepted into the Security Council. A quick oath of office to make it official and we're off to the races.

Congratulations, Guys. :clap:
 
The Security Council have voted to certify that Grimalkin (aka. Winter Sidhe) is not a Security Threat. The vote is 3-1 in favor of the above statement.
 
[[me] puts on Mod Hat.] Blue Wolf, that is totally off-topic for this thread. Create a comment thread as an observer if you want to comment on an SC action. This thread is to record actions only. Consider this a moderation caution.[Takes off Mod Hat.]
 
In accordance with Article V: Security Council, Section 2, Subsection 3 of the Constitution of the North Pacific

3. From time to time, the Council may, by majority vote, recommend an order of succession to the Delegacy beyond the Vice Delegate among members of the Security Council who are members of the Assembly. The order of succession shall be determined first, by length of current service on the Council, and if necessary, then by influence level, and then by endorsement level of Council members who have equal levels of service and then, of equal influence level. The Assembly shall immediately vote on the adoption of such recommendation by a majority vote.
Click to expand...

By majority vote of one aye and two abstains, the following succession to the Delegacy beyond the Vice Delegate is adopted.

- Vice Delegate
- Grosseschnauzer
- Pasargad

In the current event with Grosseschnauzer as Delegate, the succession will instead be from the Vice Delegate to Pasargad.
 
The Security Council by a majority vote have adopted the Procedure of the Security Council as a guideline for discussion and vote inside the Council.

Procedure of the Security Council.

1. General.
a. The Security Council shall be set out as per Constitution Article V.

2. The Chair of the Council
a. The Vice Delegate runs the day-to-day business of the Security Council, whose task it is to lay out a uniform set of guidelines by which proposed actions may be considered and voted upon.
b. In the event that the Vice Delegate is unable or unavailable to handle the above duties, the Acting Chair who shall temporary runs the day-to-day business of the Security Council will be the nation with the longest length of service on the Council.

3.The appointment of a member to the Security Council.
a. The Council shall admit by majority vote those applicants who the Council determines are not a Security Risk to the North Pacific and have meet the minimum Influence and endorsement levels prescribed by law.
b. The minimum period of discussion is two days and the minimum voting period is three days. A majority of votes cast is required.

4.The termination of a member from the Security Council.
a. The Assembly may terminate an exemption of a particular Council member from Regional Assembly membership for being a Security Risk by a two-thirds supermajority vote.
b. The minimum period of discussion is two days and the minimum voting period is three days. A two-thirds supermajority vote cast is required.

5. Advising the region of a security threat.
a. The Council may advise the Delegate and the Speaker of the Assembly concerning existing or potential security threats to the Region. The nation will be declared a security risk by a majority of votes.
b. The minimum period of discussion is two days and the minimum voting period is two days. A majority of votes cast is required.

6. Order of succession
a. The Council may, by majority vote, recommend an order of succession to the Delegacy beyond the Vice Delegate among members of the Security Council who are members of the Assembly. The order of succession shall be determined first, by length of current service on the Council, and if necessary, then by influence level, and then by endorsement level of Council members who have equal levels of service and then, of equal influence level.
b. The minimum period of discussion is three days and the minimum voting period is three days. A majority of votes cast is required.
Click to expand...
 
Felasia:
By majority vote of one aye and two abstains, the following succession to the Delegacy beyond the Vice Delegate is adopted.

- Vice Delegate
- Grosseschnauzer
- Pasargad

In the current event with Grosseschnauzer as Delegate, the succession will instead be from the Vice Delegate to Pasargad.
Click to expand...
Woah, wait, back the hell up here, you actually put in specific people as permanent successors? Don't you think that's just a tad bit reckless and able to be subject to much abuse?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top