IRCEC Media Release #NS01

IRCEC

IRCEC

TNPer
[/url]
[color=purple][b]MEDIA RELEASE #NS01: Formation of IRCEC[/b][/color]

[b]1.[/b] On the 18th October, 2008, the InterRegional Crime Enforcement Commission came to in existence.

[b]2. [/b]IRCEC aims to provide an independant crime investigation agency within NS, and protect all nations under the laws of the WA (Formerly the UN), specifically, the Universal Bill of Rights.

[b]3.[/b] IRCEC welcomes applications for employment from all walks of NS, raider or defender, though, recognises raiding as a crime, and a breach of the Universal Bill of Rights.

[b]4.[/b] IRCEC also has a legal department to bring such cases to either regional or transregional justice systems.

[b]5. [/b]For more information on IRCEC, visit our [url=http://www.ircec.i8.com]website[/url] today!

IRCEC Public Relations Office
 
I always wanted to be a criminal! :w00t:

I love how they invite raiders to join them and then turn around and declare region crashing "a crime". Smart move.
 
(Pretty sure this isn't the right forum for this but whatever)

How does this court intend to enforce its rulings (or make the charged parties show up for their trials or hearings or whatever, for that matter)?
 
So, in other words, you're the new defenders on the block?
Click to expand...

No, we are not Defenders. Yes, in some cases, raiding can be considered a crime, but I also offer the suggestion so can defending.

IRCEC also has no military arm, as a result, does not have the capability to launch or participate in military actions. IRCEC will however participate in genuine region building activities, specifically geared towards domestic security and law and order.

IRCEC seeks its enforcement capability through both regional and transregional courts, as stated earlier.

Whilst it appears we may not have any 'grunt' as such, I assure you, if the moment called for it though, we can react in a timley and effective manner.

I love how they invite raiders to join them and then turn around and declare region crashing "a crime". Smart move.
Click to expand...

I agree the wording in the media release was raw, as the legallity of raiding can be considered either legal or illegal depending on the circumstances, i believe facet of this organisations charter which will be widley debated, and as a said above, some instances of defending can be considered legal too.

Both Defenders and Raiders are invited to become active members within the IRCEC as the organisation will play a neutral role, and whilst it may not be able to 'defend or 'invade', post conflict, IRCEC can act as a mediator between parties, or if it is obvious crimes have been committed, investigate and either follow through or hand findings over to appropriate authorities.

(Pretty sure this isn't the right forum for this but whatever)
Click to expand...

Was going to post in the North Pacific Wire but did not hold the correct permissions

How does this court intend to enforce its rulings (or make the charged parties show up for their trials or hearings or whatever, for that matter)?
Click to expand...

We do not have our own court. We simply investigate and formulate a report. Our legal section then will attempt to prosecute in the appropriate courts, if it is not possible, findings will be released, and whilst no formal proceedings may have taken place, hopefully, people are aware of what has occured.
Also, a member does not have to be present to be tried. In TNP, there have been a number of cases where the prosecution of crimes has continued without the defendant present.
Though, most characters who would be invlovled in such actions, probably could not resist missing such an affair.
We also derive investigative powers regarding to legal breaches under WA Resolutions 26, 49, 53, 63, 65, 76, 88, 88, 104, 110, 111, 127, 134, 168, 190, 197, 211, and 230.
Many of these resolutions provide means to be enforced, and each breah will require different methods.

Whilst it is probably not a new concept in NS, it will be a complicated one, and I hope I explained it sufficiently for you to have a greater insight to IRCEC and the concerns you raised.
 
It is UTNP not TNPU. Different from the last university because this one is private, not affiliated with the TNP government.

Second, Mesian has asked to teach a course on the subject. The course is not final yet as I still have no idea what it is about. Chances are (sorry Mesian) that particular course will not open for enrollment at UTNP because it is clearly pure RP based.

However, I should be clear that academic freedom is an important part of UTNP and if people are interested in the course I can see it being an elective.

You'll notice though that it is not part of degree requirements nor is it listed on the home page as an open course.

And, again, UTNP is not run by The North Pacific. It is run by me :eyeroll:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top