Motions to have the WFE changed

red back

red back

TNPer
As the election results for the WA Delegate are still pending I believe the following should be removed from the WFE till a result is finalised.

Avast! I be pretty sure The Tresville Element be our new Cap'n! Endorse the scurvy lad, I ask ye!
Click to expand...
 
At the moment, the election results have bot been set aside, just that a request has been filed with the court that may involve such an action. The RA has not adopted such a declaration, and no one else has yet, either.

So for now,IMHO, I view such a motion as pre-mature.
 
Firstly, I can set the WFE to whatever I bloody well want ye lilylivered son of a bilge rat!

Secondly, I did say I be pretty sure, not that it be fact!

ARRRRR!
 
Well given that the results of the election are at odds with the constitution, I would argue that it should be taken out of the WFE until this mattered is settled.
 
Practically speaking, do you think someone *besides* Tresville is going to be our next delegate? While the courts and the RA sort out the dotting of i's and the crossing of t's, it makes sense to do whatever can be done to build up Tresville's endocount. We know the region is most vulnerable during delegacy transfers, so I consider the WFE statement beneficial to our regional security.
 
Great Bights Mum:
Practically speaking, do you think someone *besides* Tresville is going to be our next delegate? While the courts and the RA sort out the dotting of i's and the crossing of t's, it makes sense to do whatever can be done to build up Tresville's endocount. We know the region is most vulnerable during delegacy transfers, so I consider the WFE statement beneficial to our regional security.
Click to expand...
Yes that was my logic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top