Monte Ozarka
TNPer
I was wondering what people think about changing the fundamental nature of trials? Specifically, how do you all think about getting rid of juries, jury selection, and whatnot?
Personally, I find juries and the maintenance of jurors throughout a trial to be a very slow, cumbersome process. Trial by RA referendum would speed up the process dramatically, but of course, bias would be, theoretically, more relevant in trials. However, there is definitely no guarantee that a bias-free jury would be chosen in a given trial under our current system. Personally, I think the trade-off may just be worth it.
Of course, there would still be certain restrictions placed on the trial proper. For example, the general RA would still not be allowed to participate in the trial thread itself, although commentary would be allowed elsewhere.
Personally, I find juries and the maintenance of jurors throughout a trial to be a very slow, cumbersome process. Trial by RA referendum would speed up the process dramatically, but of course, bias would be, theoretically, more relevant in trials. However, there is definitely no guarantee that a bias-free jury would be chosen in a given trial under our current system. Personally, I think the trade-off may just be worth it.
Of course, there would still be certain restrictions placed on the trial proper. For example, the general RA would still not be allowed to participate in the trial thread itself, although commentary would be allowed elsewhere.