What would be your stance on Lexiconians applying to the RA?
That actually depends. I'm not totally conversant on where our regional stance in regard to Lexicon is at this current juncture. If we're still in some period of conflict, then I would probably attempt to run applications past the Cabinet that I thought were a little bit dodgy. If there is no current conflict, then I'll let them in to do their part for the RA.
do you feel that you will be able to understand the records with all the colours i have put everywhere?
Yes, given my obsession with Excel, colors are nothing.
FEC's got some Excel skillz, I remember that from February with the entire election monitoring thing, so, I'm sure she can handle your rainbow-records.
Why thank you.
In other news, how much do you agree/disagree with the following statements, Missus Bunny Tyrant:
The Constitution is bloated and needs to be rewritten.
I'm not sure bloated is the right word so much as it seems to be quite clear in some instances and remarkably vague on others. Also, sometimes *where* the heck information is located is rather weird.
The NPO is bad and we should oppose them (IC and/or OOC).
OOC: NPO boys are cuter then TWP boys.
IC: I don't really like what the NPO people do in their region. I'd rather see feeders as supporting their people as opposed to kicking them out because they're not UN or don't endorse the delegate. But on the other hand it's pretty much up to them what they do in their own region.
heh. Paranoia is good in some cases, but sometimes I think people carry it too far. I tend to try to talk to people before I give in to paranoia.
In some cases, and with huge amounts of red tape and many steps to go through, I agree. If it was able to be swift, but carried out by trusted people in the region, I think it would work much better.
grammer iz 4 stoopid losrs
Grammar is something to be practiced at all times. JAL is especially good at commas, while I specialize in the spelling aspects.
