Search results

For

Court Justice: 1. < Pallaith > 2. < Chipoli > 3. < Skaraborg > 4. < Lord Dominator > 5. < Bharat > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

This is a reason to vote against, not to block the vote at the eleventh hour.

I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.

For

For

For

I'm not saying the repeal doesn't matter at all. I'm saying that what seems to be the core argument, that the original resolution mentions the name of some GGR nations, doesn't... really make a lot of sense, because that part is just strikethrough.

Nonsense. Repealing this resolution isn't going to strike the names from the record, it's just going to format them with strikethrough text. Against.

Nation in The North Pacific: Huerta Marquez Current World Assembly nation: Stolypin Discord Username (if applicable): monichre Are you able to attend operations at 12AM/12PM EST? And if so, which times can you attend? Either, depending on when. Which branch (the Special Forces or Auxiliary) do...

Speaker: < St George > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

I think this bill would be stronger if you removed "forswearing." By replicating the exact definition of Gross Misconduct, I worry that you're just replicating the problem we already have.

I assume step 1 is the creation of a clone army

Some would say you can't insult your way to unlimited power, what say you?

Your recent initiatives seem disconnected from your party's stated purpose. Some would say that your party is devoid of competent leadership and distracted by foreign entanglements. What say you?

If there is controversy over a change the speaker makes to the text of the law, doesn't that indicate that the change is not actually purely clerical? We're talking here about corrections that are supposed to be so inconsequential that they have literally no impact on the meaning of the law...

I'd be hesitant to support this without a mechanism for the RA to override the Speaker's decision, because sometimes what counts as "substantive meaning" is ambiguous. For the same reason I think it is better to say "may" rather than "will," because I think there are cases where reasonable...

Well, it turns out you were right about the two justices not being able to agree, so now it's a moot point :P

You and I will have to agree to disagree on this, but I think it's better for a decision that isn't time-sensitive to take longer if that's the cost of being more well-considered. Just because a bare majority of the Court has the power to issue a decision, doesn't mean there's any real reason...

Have you thought about deciding you're going to quit forever and locking yourself out of all your accounts so you can come back a few months later?

If the decision isn't urgent, then why wouldn't the Court wait for all justices/hearing officers to weigh in, rather than rush out a decision based only on the opinion of two justices?

It looks like the Discord user you're talking about was banned from the server? (Edit: although I see it was after you made this post)

As a matter of fact, it used to be, but that hasn't been the case for over a decade.

Generally, I support this bill. Gross misconduct has served as a judicial cudgel for years and this change has been a long time coming. Intrusion seems to me to prohibit information-gathering against anyone, is that intentional? It seems extreme, especially when there are plenty of...

May I be masked as a citizen?

Well to be clear it is a real application, sorry for the confusion

Nation: Huerta Marquez I pledge loyalty to The North Pacific and its territories, obedience to her laws, and responsible action as a member of her society. I pledge to only register one nation to vote in The North Pacific. I pledge that no nation under my control will wage war against the North...