Search results

I appreciate your enthusiasm for the region but I think this run is a bit premature - after all you weren't even a citizen when the last election took place. I'd encourage you to continue participating in the Executive Staff to learn more about how our government functions. I know that can be a...

You ask if any recent bills have benefitted from being arbitrarily held back for a vote, but I can throw the opposite question back at you - has there been any detrimental effect on the region that some of these bills have been held back from a vote? Some bills might require less time to...

I agree with this. I'm more thinking from the perspective of regular citizens, the two-bill limit gives more time for citizens to consider the bills rather than voting on all of them at once.

Woah…

Congratulations Cosmic. May you enjoy the various comfortable armchairs available for you in the General's quarters.

The short answer to your question is "for fun", or to be more precise, it was created as satire. It was never intended to anything other than that. People used to have a bit of fun with it, as you can see in the sub-forum that's specifically dedicated to it, but it died down a long time ago...

Changing the WFE or suppressing the RMB is a complete non-issue right now because all it takes is for the Delegate to make a single post announcing they've authorised the NPA to do it in a particular region. And that's what this bill is trying to change, allowing the NPA to banject natives...

Banjecting natives is a serious action and it could hardly be called micromanaging for the RA to restrict the NPA on its ability to do that. The NPA has always been perfectly empowered to banject liberators and defenders without any RA approval, which is what most banjections are during the...

I just find it ridiculous that idea that it should be fine for the NPA to ignore all restrictions so long as another org is technically leading the operation. And there's no vote required to get rid of Class A restrictions, just a post from the Delegate.

Or...we can keep the law as it is, because it currently says nothing about giving the RA advance notice. The NPA could take a region, then inform the RA, gather influence while waiting for the RA to vote on performing restricted actions, then banject to your heart's content after the RA gives...

I'm with Pallaith on this one. I'm opposed to this bill and in support of the alternative that Pallaith put forward.

It literally takes a one-line post from the Delegate to exempt a region from Class A restrictions. This is another example of blaming the NPA's problems on our laws when the real problems lie elsewhere.

Don't know why the author is rushing for a vote, it's literally been posted less than two days ago and many people haven't even read this. As I said before, it's going to be a pointless addition to our laws if no one commits to celebrating it. I'm opposed.

I was in the NPA back when its operations were primarily raiding. And as far as I can recall the restrictions on the NPA were even stricter back then. That didn't stop the NPA from both leading our own raids and supporting raids by our friends and allies. The arguments that our current...

Look man, Flemingovianism is already in the Legal Code as the official religion, if people aren't celebrating it it's because people aren't interested. Putting a new holiday in the Legal Code won't suddenly make anyone interested. If you want to do something for Flemingovianism, it's better you...

To Acting Delegate @Halsoni: In the interest of greater transparency, I am requesting the release of any and all government records (as defined by Clause 7.4.34 of the Legal Code) and private government records (as defined by Clause 7.4.35 of the Legal Code) relating to: Discussions within...

If the possibility of the RA vetoing an op is slim, then surely it's alright to wait a couple days for the RA to give its full approval before proceeding to banject the natives?

It goes back to what I asked back at the start, which is are we expecting to undertake more destructive operations now - and if so, what would those operations look like and who would we be cooperating with? As far as I can see there's very much a dearth of these kind of operations among our...

Are there any recent examples of us being excluded or sidelined because of these restrictions? Most of our current allies only conduct destructive operations against enemy regions, and as I recall it we had no problem participating in the invasion of Solidarity, which was the one big raid during...

I'm not sure where the sudden motivation to change our military laws is coming from. Are we planning on participating in more destructive operations from now on? Do we even have any allies we could be undertaking these operations with? I don't see anything wrong with the new clause 50, but the...

Thank you for your service, and thank you for choosing to resign on this date in my honour, as I'm sure is the reason

Justice: 1. < Eluvatar > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

What do you plan on working with your "comrades" on? And what are "whatever is necessary" things that you plan to do? You've said you plan on creating Weekly Justice Reports but you haven't really said what you expect to be included in them and I can't see anything specific that you said you...

This is a lot words but if I'm reading it correctly it appears your argument is that we don't need GA#17's mandatory contributions because we can just assume the money has to come from somewhere?

Can you elaborate on what the areas of improvement are then? Do you think people breaking the law is a big enough issue that the region will need weekly reminder of how not to break the law?

Tense? I don't really think so, nothing seems too out of the ordinary to me. My feelings about the future of the region is a different matter but I don't feel like going into all that right now.

I nominate @Attempted Socialism

Against. The supposed issues raised by the proposal are trivial at best, and the General Fund strikes the right balance between fiscal responsibility and giving the WA sufficient funds to enforce its laws.

Justice: 1. < Abstain >

I do believe the new system is a considerable improvement over the old Attorney General system. I will preface by saying that there were actually two significant changes to the justice system after the Attorney General was abolished - firstly the concept of delegate-appointed prosecutors was...