Search results

Admins, I (have left the region and)request removal of citizienship.

If I read the last court verdict correctly then this R4R has to be reopened.

Most roleplaying proposals would breach the Bill of Rights. This one does not. However, you'd still need support from the Assembly. As the Assembly is widely seen as a gameplay body, it probably won't support this.

Thanks for asking these questions: 1. As you said it is a matter for the Regional Assembly to discuss this. As long as these flexible options exist I, as Judge, have normally to assume that the Assembly wants me to deliberate on the full range of possibilities. Which means that I have to look...

Vote me. I have time again(last month was not so good). I think that every case will take lots of time because I'd need to reread every decision ever made to make sure that I make the right decision. At the same extension I would probably not be a good Chief Justice in my first term. If I see...

I accept my nomination

Vice Delegate Siwale, Head of the Security Council, there have been two CTE(Ceasing To Exist) incidents in a short amount of time:Plembobria(15 days ago) and Silly String(right now) The endorsements of a security councilor play an important role in ensuring safety of the region. What will be...

Well in this case... I'll try to do Monthly Memoirs for February.

Because: 1. I have no good idea for a theme 2. Gathering interviews with TNP'ers will probably not be successful because I have never done anything for communications before("Who wants to interview me? Uhhh... no thanks.")

Well, then I'll have to sit this one out- I know what I can and what I can't do and the memoirs belong to can't.

Not much left... I'll try .

Nation in The North Pacific:Clean Land Ministry you are interested in joining:Communications (Optional) Previous experience in this area of government:None

If you have strong RL constraints that hinder your ability the right way is to resign. I want to inform you that a recall motion has just gotten 4 approvals for immediate vote.

I move for an immediate vote.

For

I messaged the THO's about them missing their self-designated deadline. Two of them replied. One of them said "Very soon". That was seven days ago. Cogoria posted in the thread then, once. And then further questions did not get answered. The THOs missed their self-imposed deadline by a mile...

And I am here too

Delegate: Gladio Would you like to reopen nominations? No Vice Delegate: Bootsie Would you like to reopen nominations? No Speaker: Darcania Would you like to reopen nominations? No Attorney General: Goyanes Would you like to reopen nominations? Yes

So no restrictions like... patents... no disturbing the dead restriction... religious convictions... property rights... :headbang: Against.

For

Against

I accept my nomination for the office of Speaker.

And this one isn't protected? Hmm not really effective.

Where is the scheduled vote?

For

Hmm... any update on the vote schedule?

I have heard allegations that the proposer is quite biased and has a connection to Texas. Additionally, it was not very well drafted. It does not look that bad tho... so vote abstain

Yes. Motion to vote.

I vote For.

To help the court with its deliberations, I hereby submit my considerations: Consideration 1:Proposals I agree with the then Acting Attorney General, Silly String, that ordinary proposals cannot be reviewed by the court. However, the proposal was already beyond deliberation stage, as a vote...