Search results

Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Halsoni > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < Cosmic > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Justice: 1. < Attempted Socialism > 2. < Picairn > 3. < Vivanco > 4. < Nutmeg The Squirrel > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Against

Nation in The North Pacific: Xagill Discord Username: Rocketdog Mark X in the boxes for each thing you are interested in this term: [ ] Recruiting (Telegram Lists, Manual Recruitment, ...) [X] Mentor (Forum, Discord and Gameside) [X] Birthday Messages [ ] Reviewing Resources (telegrams...

Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Simone > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < Matzerati > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

For

1. < Pallaith > 2. < Dreadton> 3. < Picairn >

Congrats to the winners!

Delegate: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Vice Delegate: < Sil Dorsett > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < AraFuttio > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Court Justice: 1. < Pallaith > 2. < Vivanco > 3. < NutmegTheSquirrel > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Nation in The North Pacific: Xagill Discord Username: ROcketdog Mark X in the boxes for each thing you are interested in this term: [ ] Recruiting (Telegram Lists, Manual Recruitment, ...) [X] Mentor (Forum, Discord and Gameside) [X] Birthday Messages [X] Reviewing Resources (telegrams...

Discord Username: rocketdog Article Writing (TNS, TNL, etc.): < No > Article Editing (TNS, TNL, etc.): < Yes > NBS Show Participation: < Yes > NBS Show Editing: < Yes > NBS Show Hosting: < No >

For

Delegate: 1. < Simone > 2. < Dreadton > 3. < Robespierre > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: 1. < Cloud > 2. < AraFuttio > 3. < Noscar > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

I seem to be missing Security Councilor mask.

I request a shortened formal debate period.

I move for a vote.

Changed to delete clause 26 and have clause 27 reference the endorsement cap.

Court Justice: 1. < Dreadton > 2. < Pallaith > 3. < Vivanco > 4. < Eluvatar > 5. < Lord Dominator > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Thoughts on changing 5.26 to Otherwise I am happy to delete the clause and have 5.27 be the only mechanism for territories.

It needs to meet all of the criteria in 5.26 for that ejection to happen. I don't wish to eject someone simply because for one update there are just above the endorsement cap by one. Also 5.27 gives powers to the directly to the delegate if the VD or security council are slow to react for any...

I need it to be higher then the endorsement cap that the frontier would set, which is the strict cap, so i have amended it to 30% might be a good area based on 25% endorsment cap that is seen in large frontiers. The other option is seeting 5.27 to be a certain percentage / amount above the...

I have added a clause in 5.2 for frontier VD's to set an endorsement cap and change 5.4.26 to the endorsement cap and 5.27 to 45% (fast track threshold). I think we need to set and endorsement cap for frontiers, dont know if the VD should be responsible and if its in the correct section of the...

For 5.4.26, would the changing percentage from 55% to 40% and for 5.4.27 65% to 50% (fast track threshold) be better? We might need another system for Frontiers and have a stricter endorsement culture.

With the changes to the VD minimum, 5.4.25 will now only effect the top half of the SCs as the VD minimum is now higher (as of this post if the Act was implemented it would be at 708). The minimum wouldn't change wildly as it will be based on the WA Delegate.

The existing vice delegate required endorsement level as of this post is 576, which sits at roughly 55% of WA nations. WA nations are starting to being close to reaching that threshold. This act raises fast track threshold to just below where security councillors endorsement sits, whist keeping...

The Security Council has been discussing endorsement gathering. To improve the calculating of reckless endorsement gathering, the proposal bases it as a percentage WA delegate (instead of the previous VD minimums). This simplifies the the calculation and keeps the threshold consistent regardless...

For me that perception is accurate, the impacts of bad decisions at the end of his delegacy did play a part in my vote. Gorundu has the qualifications and skills to be on the SC, is Gorundu is recommitted to TNP? Can he learn from that situation? I voted Nay because the time since it happened...

Congrats!

TNP Nation (e.g.: Simone_Republic): Xagill Discord Username: Rocketdog Any WA Resolutions authored / interest in writing WA resolutions (especially SC): None WA Area of Focus (GA, SC, or both, up to you): Both