Search results

Just a note, strangely enough I still retain my SC membership after parsing the forums for the first time in a while. If you think it's beneficial to leave me as a member due to my regional influence in keeping security in the region, by all means. But I feel like I'm cheating in a way as I'm...

Now how did Lennart find out about my scheme? Edit: Someone should probably remove my SC tag, as much as I like it I am not nearly active enough lol

I'm excited to see the results of this :P

Looks good to me.

Aye

What sort of signs are there? Maybe it's something that can be troubleshot? One can always hope x)

I always knew you were up to something smelly!

I voted for 4 Months.

Actually, I think that definition posted above is quite clear. After reading over it, I have no immediate questions. However, when I have more time, I will try to review it and see if some parts could be worded clearer.

I, Enif, a Vassal with 182 endorsements wish to apply for the Security Council.

Enif I, Enif, leader of The North Pacific nation of The Terran Imperium of Enif, pledge loyalty to the region, to abide by its laws, and to act as a responsible member of its society. I pledge to only register one Nation to vote in The North Pacific. I pledge that no nation under my control...

NS is a game, and as it stands, the vast arrays of text walls and rules and regulations are not something I would want to play when I get home from my office job. I agree with the OP. Edit: As it stands, its dreadfully boring.

I learned that I'm destined to be a forum lurker due to RL being such a !@*#^

As for the 15 days rule, I voted "FOR" that rule, and I may be regretting it. Although I poke around the forum here and there, I do not make a post all that often, therefore risking my RA Membership status. A reversal of that may be something I would get behind. As for the Government being...

Certainly a useful list, indeed.

Abstain.

IRC is free, right? Why doesn't someone just make a new channel and have any member of the RA or higher have ops only? Edit: Heck, I might do do some looking into setting one up later. All we'd have to do is redirect the link on the WFE, and maybe here on the forums if it's anywhere.

If this works as it should, it would be really great!

If there was no consent for a special election, then there must be a reason for why consent was not given, which would need to be addressed before moving on. This is why we would look for consent in the first place.

Maybe the new and old statements could be combined into a somewhat hybrid. Maybe: ...the elected official will be automatically removed from office after it was notified to the Regional Assembly of this inactivity by any Regional Assembly member. The special election for a replacement will be...

I support this motion.

This resolution both states to disarm the weapons, and that they may be used for peaceful purposes. Which is it? Voted against because I don't like the WA running my military.

I agree with this, I think it would be a good way to help keep voting and elections smooth and error-free.

I would consider it, but I don't meet criteria at this time, if I recall correctly.

Agreed. Keep things looking, and acting, organized.

Well, here is a slight revision with some grammatical, spelling and punctuational changes, if anyone likes these changes more than the current revision.

Sounds good.

I check my actual Nation on NationStates more than the forum, so a telegram for me, at least, would be greatly appreciated. A PM+Email reminder would do just as well. Because, I am quite busy in RL, but if I know that I can help by taking 5 minutes out of my day to cast a vote, I certainly will.

Tent

Sandwich