Two of the main claims made in this thread were contradicted by the proposal author, so for now I am slightly leaning For this proposal. I will say that the claim that the “close equivalents” part can be exploited is a convincing claim.
I only explain my vote if my reasoning is more broad than just ‘no major errors’ or something else for the opposite side of the agreement spectrum. :P
Otherwise, especially for proposals I am strongly against, I will provide an explanation.