Search results

I actually think getting the RMB's input on this is a good call. As someone who doesn't chat on the RMB much, my notion of how to handle moderating it is "suppress slurs/flaming/other rule breaking, report to NS as needed, have delegate ban repeat problems". But people who are on the RMB a lot...

Ruling of the Court of The North Pacific In regards to the judicial inquiry filed by Gracius Maximus on Alterations to the Citizenship Oath Opinion drafted by SillyString, joined by Eluvatar and OwenStacey The Court took into consideration the inquiry filed here by Gracius Maximus. The Court...

Excellent!! Once we post this ruling, your active service as a THO will be over (unless someone posts another r4r before the election is over... <_<), but I hope you will be willing to stay on in a, uh, seat-warming capacity until the court has 3 justices again. :P

I accept my nomination for justice. :)

Elu and I did some working and came up with this draft: Ruling of the Court of The North Pacific In regards to the judicial inquiry filed by Gracius Maximus on Alterations to the Citizenship Oath Opinion drafted by SillyString, joined by Eluvatar and OwenStacey The Court took into...

:rofl:

I am also fine with increasing the limit to 7 days - I think that strikes a reasonable balance.

I would change the title to "on the Freedom of Information Act and Non-Forum Content".

I apologize for the delay on this. We have come to a rough agreement and are finalizing some specifics and phrasing. It should not be much longer.

@North Yeetland does not pass admin check at the moment. I will send them a message.

Passed and masked. Done.

On what authority do you presume to resurrect the Order of Gryphons? :eyebrow:

Yeah I agree that that's too much to ask of the Speaker's office - that sort of wibbly wobbly is why we don't want to let the speaker interpret if the oath is ok in the first place. After further thought I think the following approach to oaths might work: I'm not sold on this wording but what...

Done.