Search results

Done. @Bobberino, Iraelia has NPA masking. Should this be removed also?

nickterooze, Guyomartand, Elai, Runeda, and Troopersorder66 have passed admin check. They have been remasked as citizens along with Great Javadwipa. Middle Vers, Limerick1, and Cuyan all pass admin check as well.

Done

James David, The Republic of Kendell, Derperor Derp Derp, and Justinian pass admin checks and have been remasked as citizens. I decline to security check myself. Great Javadwipa passes admin check.

I thought y'all might like to see what we've done in the past! So I took photos of my 2017 and 2018 collections. :) (Note: Shotglass from 2018 is missing because I think it was stolen by a thieving turtle...)

Nation: SillyString I pledge loyalty to The North Pacific, obedience to her laws, and responsible action as a member of her society. I pledge to only register one nation to vote in The North Pacific. I pledge that no nation under my control will wage war against the North Pacific. I understand...

HECK YEAH DEM-DAY! :tnp: Y'all I am so excited about the RP rewards this year - we are stoked about being able to offer them!! :w00t:

I agree that our expectations for government officials, and in particular SCers, have changed. I also agree that the change from citizenship being linked to legislative activity in the RA has removed the original argument for this exemption. I support this bill.

The answer is going to be a "no" on multiple accounts. You may have one account - it's your choice whether it's called Janus, Isimud, Petraeus, or Paraval. You are not permitted to create additional accounts. Your previous post has not been edited, by you or anyone else. The password to...

What are your reasons for wanting multiple accounts?

I'll admit, I'm having a hard time following all of the threads of what's going on, so I could have been misunderstanding. But I guess I prefer for the university to be free to start some sort of broadcasted content (??) and have that be whatever content it deems appropriate - cooking shows...

This seems like a good call. The idea of a University not being able to have any non-NS content was raising my hackles, to be honest. Not much of a university at that point.

I am disappointed that you have chosen to respond to my concerns about your vagueness with.... additional vagueness. Given that I myself was on the Security Council until yesterday, and that (as I have already stated) I have no idea what you are talking about, you are absolutely incorrect that...

I am perplexed by you. Siwale has served the region with distinction, and his nomination was overwhelmingly supported by the SC when it went to vote. Despite Siwale's record, you apparently have serious enough concerns with how he has conducted himself toward other members of the community...

Against

How about this? Replacing your paragraph:

I would say "until February 1, 2020" instead of "through a period of two general elections". I think it's more easily understood, plus it's a set time period that's not dependent on anything else (e.g., if we change the name away from "general elections", there wouldn't be an issue with the...

OK so, putting it all together... I think all Elu did to that paragraph was remove a word, so I removed it. :unsure: I still have one section to finish - I was rereading the request and briefs and realized we didn't address the AG's arguments on speech abroad. Will deffo finish that this...

What is your change??? Also, I think it's weird for you to copy the official ruling format in your dissent, and to invent a seal. I don't mind you posting dissenting thoughts but it should be as a straightforward post, not "I personally reviewed XYZ documents and found ABC." I think you should...

I do not believe it belongs in the official ruling - it would not represent the opinion of the court. I think, if you wanted to issue a dissent, you could do so as a separate post in the thread.

Y'all are free to help with the drafting if you are getting impatient. <_<

Done.

Y'know, I see this sort of sentiment a lot when relatively new people run for office, and most of the time it seems like a cheap shot to try to drum up anti-establishment sentiment. But I don't get the impression that you're doing that; on the contrary, your answers to the questions you've been...

What led to your decision to run earlier than intended? What is the current requirement to reach quorum, and to what votes does it apply?

If you were the Attorney General and you received a serious criminal complaint against someone who had left the game and with whom there was, to the best of your knowledge, no way of getting in contact with, would you pursue an indictment with the court even in that person's absence?

Thank you for your thoughtful answer!

If you were in a one-on-one unrecorded voice chat with the delegate, and they told you outright that they were going to coup TNP (and you believed they were being honest, not joking), but you had no proof or documentation of this, what would you do?

We've got more case law than chapters of the legal code!!! :P