Search results

While I appreciate the nomination, I must decline. I do not have the endorsements needed for delegate or vice delegate, and I do not have a platform to run on for any of the positions.

For.

This really isn't worth you lying about.

I agree with Dreadton. I don't see any colourable legal claim -- either criminal charge or request for review -- and I don't appreciate my name being used in this way. For instance, I do not believe that any of my rights or freedoms have been violated by Dreadton throughout this sad saga. In...

Dreadton your inane personal dislike for me is not a surprise, but your novel interpretation of that snippet from the Discord conversation can't be left standing, because you have to know that it's a lie when you fabricate a quote in an attempt to make me say the opposite of what I said. I don't...

Against.

I honestly don't know why you continue this line, because you making a mockery of the court is the better version of events for you. The alternative as I see it is that you knowingly mislead the Court in an effort to get a case tried unfairly. I have only used your words and actions as evidence...

Against. I don't see anything that is so outstanding that it merits recognition.

Please remove my masking as Justice.

Application for Admission to the Bar Applicant name: Attempted Socialism Part One: Experience as a Justice or counsel 1. Have you served as a Justice (including as a Temporary Hearing Officer)? <Yes> (if No, move to question 5) 2. Between what dates did you serve as a Justice (including as a...

Against. Let LWU burn Algerheaven to the ground if they want. Preferably the next frontier Algerstonia created too. Nothing of value will be lost, and genuinely new players can avoid the risk of spawning there.

Court Justice: 1. < Wymondham > 2. < Lord Dominator > 3. < Eluvatar > 4. < Just a Lore > 5. < Bobberino > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Against.

While I appreciate the nominations, I will not run for another term at this time. I have been on the bench for a year, and I need a sabbatical. I will run again in the future, but not now.

The process of drafting the language has sadly taken a bit longer than expected, so we are too close to the election for this Court to both give the public a fair chance to offer feedback on the proposed language and decide whether to finally implement the changes discussed. As such, the...

The process of drafting the language has sadly taken a bit longer than expected, so we are too close to the election for this Court to both give the public a fair chance to offer feedback on the proposed language and decide whether to finally implement the changes discussed. As such, the...

The process of drafting the language has sadly taken a bit longer than expected, so we are too close to the election for this Court to both give the public a fair chance to offer feedback on the proposed language and decide whether to finally implement the changes discussed. As such, the...

Against.

Would you be OK with me posting the draft revisions for public comment? It will be up to the next Court to decide whether to go forward, but since it has been my pet project I would like to put it out there before I leave the bench. @Wymondham @Eluvatar

We are nearing the election, so I would prefer to either publish the reforms for public comment now, or leave it for the next Court to decide.

@Eluvatar and @Wymondham Bumping this to see if we can come to an agreement.

An earlier version had an error in the penultimate section, where I had inadvertently written 'witness', but it should say 'Defence'. I have edited my brief to correct the error, and preserved the original below.

I will start this brief by clearing up a two things. First, did I make a mistake? Yes, obviously. I should have clearly accepted the evidence as presented by the Prosecution, given that the Defence made no attempt to contest the posts, and the posts were preserved in their original place and a...

I don't know if they're serious, and in a way, it doesn't matter. If they're serious then they're a Neonazi, and if they're not serious, then they believe that Neonazi talking points and White Supremacist conspiracies are fun ways to show off how edgy they are. Is one far more despicable than...

Yes, I intend to submit a brief.

That's true. I don't much appreciate that Algerstonia keeps spouting Neonazi talking points, and promotes white supremacist conspiracies. That generally puts me off. I'm weird like that.

Humour is allowed. This just isn't funny. Against. Algerstonia doesn't deserve nice things.

If the charges are dropped then the correct thing -- at least as I see it -- would be to post in the trial thread that the Court recognises that the charges are dropped and orders the bans (which were pending the trial) to be lifted? I'm quite puzzled and not really happy about it, but if the...

@Eluvatar @Wymondham I know there are a lot of other things going on, so I just want to make sure you didn't miss this. The process as I imagine it is that if we agree on a change, because these are maybe more controversial than the THO one, we post the proposed wording in the respective threads...

As I am recused in the request for review arising from the trial of TNP v. KEKISTON, GrandEngland, the appointed Standby Hearing Officer shall take my place for the request for review. @Simone please take your oath.