Search results

  1. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis"

    "Repeal "Liberate Eclipsis"" was defeated 6,233 votes to 4,931.
  2. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Condemn New Ordered

    [Non-WA] Against, no forum drafting and remarkably poorly written. To quote my high school math teacher, "ya done a shoddy job".
  3. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Condemn New Ordered

    Overview This resolution seeks to condemn New Ordered for being a bad diplomat. Recommendation This shabby resolution, which was not drafted on the forums, fails to convince us that New Ordered deserves any recognition at all given that their sole condemnable feature is being bad at their job...
  4. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Condemn New Ordered

    Condemn Category: < Condemnation > | Target: New Ordered Proposed by: MysticShores | No Onsite Topic Yet Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect...
  5. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Regulating Games Of Chance And Skill

    [Non-WA] Per the last thread, and noting how little has changed in terms of substance, I'm going to have to be solidly against this time. https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/9198680/
  6. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Regulating Games Of Chance And Skill

    Overview This proposal seeks to regulate chances of game and skill, specifically the extent to which they can be used in advertising, use participant data, and how their rules must be defined and disclosed. Recommendation While protecting consumers in this regard is admirable, we worry this...
  7. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Regulating Games Of Chance And Skill

    Regulating Games Of Chance And Skill Category: Regulation | Area of Effect: Consumer Protection Proposed by: Walfo, Co-author: Starkindler | Onsite Topic Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements...
  8. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Repeal: "Reducing Bycatch"

    [non-WA] Against, no forum draft.
  9. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Repeal: "Reducing Bycatch"

    Overview This resolution seeks to repeal "reducing bycatch". Recommendation We recommend a vote against regardless of merits on the basis that this resolution was drafted using ChatGPT & not on the forums.
  10. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Repeal: "Reducing Bycatch"

    Repeal: "Reducing Bycatch" Category: Repeal | Target: GA#725 Proposed by: L V M H, Co-authors: Eco-Paris Reformation, Communist Lukania | No Onsite Topic Yet Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these...
  11. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—FOR] Repeal: "Concerning Financial Fraud"

    Repeal "Concerning Financial Fraud" was passed 8,095 votes to 3,177.
  12. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—FOR] Repeal: "Procedural Rights of Defendants"

    [Non-WA] In favor, in particular the point about how the target (embarrassingly) allows defendants to simply not identify themselves in a court of law is enough for me.
  13. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—FOR] Repeal: "Procedural Rights of Defendants"

    Overview Repeal: "Procedural Rights of Defendants" seeks to repeal GA#706 in order to replace it with more effective language. Recommendation The arguments made here soundly demonstrate the fact that GA#706 is simply a poor resolution, while it does attempt to do good. Among other things...
  14. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—FOR] Repeal: "Procedural Rights of Defendants"

    Repeal: "Procedural Rights of Defendants" Category: Repeal | Target: GA#706 Proposed by: Lieutenant Columbo | Onsite Topic Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or...
  15. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—FOR] On Embassy Collection

    On Embassy Collection was passed 8,478 votes to 2,548.
  16. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis"

    [Non-WA] Aside from the fact that we're treaty obligated to vote against, this is a poorly written badge hunt which only brings more attention to what is now a raider trophy.
  17. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis"

    Overview Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis" seeks to remove a liberation on a region that has been invaded and refounded, Eclipsis, after the failure of defensive forces to secure the region post-invasion. Recommendation Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis" is nothing less than an opportunistic and poorly...
  18. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis"

    Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis" Category: < Repeal > | Target: SC#501 Proposed by: Tinhampton | Onsite Topic Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect...
  19. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Civilian Air Compact

    Civilian Air Compact was passed 8,682 votes to 3,834.
  20. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Commend Philosophers

    Commend Philosophers was passed 8,127 votes to 2,893.
  21. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—FOR] Repeal: "Concerning Financial Fraud"

    [Non-WA] Seems fairly obvious to me this should be repealed given the "further noting" lines, even if I think a lot of arguments here are a massive stretch. For.
  22. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—FOR] Repeal: "Concerning Financial Fraud"

    Overview This proposal seeks to repeal GA177, which aims to ensure compensation for victims of financial fraud. While the intent to protect victims is commendable, the proposal highlights the problematic implications of mandating compensation derived solely from the perpetrator's assets...
  23. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—FOR] Repeal: "Concerning Financial Fraud"

    Repeal: "Concerning Financial Fraud" Category: Repeal | Target: GA#177 Proposed by: Simone Republic | Onsite Topic Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of...
  24. Jinkies

    [GA—UP NEXT] Right to Exit a Member State

    [Non-WA] I'm against this resolution as it stands because it intentionally excludes civil proceedings from a list of reasons people can be detained in a member state. It is an unfortunate fact that people may flee a civil suit after service, and member states should have the right to govern...
  25. Jinkies

    [GA—UP NEXT] Right to Exit a Member State

    Right To Exit A Member State Category: Civil Rights | Strength: Mild Proposed by: Simone Republic | Onsite Topic Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that...
  26. Jinkies

    [GA—AT VOTE—AGAINST] International Criminal Apprehension Accord

    "International Criminal Apprehension Accord" was defeated 9,747 votes to 1,638.
  27. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—FOR] Repeal: "Condemn The Black Hawks"

    Repeal "Condemn The Black Hawks" was passed 7,435 votes to 4,029.
  28. Jinkies

    [SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Commend Philosophers

    [Non-WA] I'm not convinced this region is commendable, especially given the lack of effort put into continuity you'd like to see in a commendation of a community. None of the things listed would be commendable by themselves and putting them all together just elucidates to me how the entire...
Back
Top