Search results

The Buffs be damned it's the Connaught Rangers here.

How am I off the mark if you assume I'm "aggressively gathering endorsements"? That is a default assumption you have made which when tested proved to be wrong. Here's a radical idea for you, have you considered that there is a big area between trust and distrust which is called "don't know...

What planet are you on? Has all of this diaglogue just failed to enter your consciousness? Are you familiar with King Lear? Why need you 100 knights when 50 will do. Why 50 indeed when 20 would suffice. I have stated as clearly and frankly as I can that I am not now, have ever been , or plan...

But jumping in with the ultimate sanction gives you nowhere else to go. Come on you must have seen those hostage negotiation films. You reach the point where a threat becomes redundant because that is all it is. Ever considered discussion before direct action?

Thats my point there is no clarification, I was given three options which boiled down to comply or get booted out. As for the methods I don't know but the default setting seems to be if you are not one of the select inner circle then you are a threat. Ever considered just asking before...

Sorry Eluvatar but I did not, as you term it, aggressicely seek endorsementts. I played the game as I saw others doing. It has only been explained after the event why you think this is wrong, and it wasn't you who provided the explanation. Again, sorry but saying "It was threatening, yes...

I'm sorry Eluvatar but that just smacks of "if you aint with us then you must be against us". I can see how you need to be aware of potential threats but you really do need to reconsider your methods of determining if someone is trustworthy or not.

It was an, from the viewpoint of the threatened, unprovoked threat dealt with a heavy hand. I understand a bit more of the mechanics of the system now but it wasn't a threat of a ban it was an ultimatum, short and sweet. Rule by edict is bound to cause a reaction. Not the best way to make...

Very true Byakhee, very true. Well I hope I've answered all Glorious Leaders questions and avoided the wrath of The Star Chamber. It's a pity that Svoboda couldn't contribute more constructively to the debate or respond to my questions in the same honest and open manner in which I have...

Sydia, I still don't get how the mechanics of this works. How does someone use endorsements to damage the delegate? I can see how if you had more endorsements but not if you were significantly behind them.

Tresville, thats a nasty cough you have there. Try hot whiskey, lemon, honey and cloves. It works every time.

Now why did you have to bring Pigalle into the conversation? There goes my train of thought completely out of the window. I do agree though that some people for one reason or another are becoming a little bit precious about things and lashing out with little or no thought when a simple...

Tresville, Correct me if I'm wrong but I never said you were the one dishing them out, that honour goes to Svoboda. I'm glad you have seen fit to return my endorsement, thank you for acknowledging that you acted in error. Thanks also for your guidance but you still haven't answered why I...

Treville, Please go back and re-read the message exchanges. Being told to dump all your endorsements or you will be expelled is in my eyes an edict. I work in the legalprofession and most Judicial Reviews start Please so your argument is fatuous, it's the content which matters not the...

Thanks at last for someone to actually take the time to explain what the hell is going on. 1) I'm seeking endorsements as I thought it was part of the game. No mystery I'm just here for the fun of it so no need to panic about Reds under the bed. 2) This is the only Region I have been or...

Multiple conversations, ok so this may be a little fragmented but I hope it makes sense. Tresville. Why are you dishing out edicts without explanations? surely it is better to take people with you than to wind them up with aggressive posturing. A simple question such as "why are you seeking...

You asked me here to answer your questions so here I am. To avoid any confusion over terminology please refrain from using game speak or if you must then please provide a clear explanation of what the term means. If you have any questions then I'm only too happy to give a full and honest...

Well now I have your attention perhaps you would do me the courtesey of explaining what is wrong with exchanging endorsements and why you feel it necesary to threaten people with expulsion rather than communicate in a reasonable and diplomatic manner. As I said in my initial post, my only...

So what's your alleged offence? Mine is apparently being a tart. whilst I find somewhat amusing considering my gender I do think it's rather offensive terminology to be tossed around. It would appear that somehow I have offended the powers that be but no one has thusfar had the balls to...

Well I'm a very reasonable person so it probably would be but I just object to being threatened by someone who doesn't have the balls to actually respond to what I thought was a reasonable request for clarification. Do you think that'sunfair of me? I'm enjoying playing this simulation and...

Well I'm here to answer any questions you have as requested by Zemnaya Svoboda aka Eluvatar. But first I want to put things in perspective. Firstly, this is the only communication I've received from Glorious Leader. Secondly, I have politely asked that he/she/it lets me know what I have done...

Well I'm here to answer any questions you have as requested by Zemnaya Svoboda aka Eluvatar. But first I want to put things in perspective. Firstly, this is the only communication I've received from Glorious Leader. Secondly, I have politely asked that he/she/it lets me know what I have done...