Search results

:no: Trust me: *I* know it!

(*sorry, i'm not not-posting because i do not think you guys do deserve it. but i've been ip-banned and then... uhm... i'm here again. considering i'm not sure flem INTENDED to readmit me, i'll wait for his clearance to post again*) ... ... (*ok, smart guys. i'll wait for his clearance...

But there's no chance on earth he'll be heard. Whichever his defense will be, he'll be judged a traitor. This is not due process, Khark.

It's your call, Flem. I just do not want to endanger my region, exposing it to possible retailiations. I'm acting on my own. As a NSer who thought freedom of speech was something respected throughout the whole NS. The best I can say is I have never been on this forum before... uhm...

HC... Romanoffia has clearly expressed his views. Why should Matthuis ever bow to such a trial, when he has no chances to be ACTUALLY considered? Referring to your statement... yep, it should be him the one contesting the judge. And indeed I'm not formally contesting. I'm just observing. And I...

(*sighs*) this is not an attempt to derail anything, HC. it's just an attempt to have a discussion about principles, considering everyone round here cries for them. however... it's a sad day when such a respected NSer as you feels the need to hide behind his own finger to avoid facing the...

This is strange, Romanoffia. You go on with wikipedia-like explanations about formal issues... and you carefully avoid coming to the gist of the problem. You can make fun of me as long as you want... but doing this you do not do anything else but strengthening the sensation you should step down...

Yes, Flemingovia. I would mind. My identity is irrelevant, just as my original region. And considering the ongoing situation, forgive me if I won't trust anyone saying "oh no, dear curious NSer, we'll not retaliate against your region, should we be able to locate where you're from". Will it...

:blink: Due process? I thought "due process" meant something on the line of "the defendant is entitled to an unbiased trial". Am I wrong? If you cannot answer my former question, Romanoffia... can I at least ask you what does "unbiased" mean, in your opinion?

I honestly appreciate the dissertation about the SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. But that wasn't the purpose of my comment. I'm just saying: aren't you a bit BIASED, Romanoffia, to be the one deciding the case, be it a Summary Judgement, a Complete one or whatever you name it?

Thak you, Ozarka, for your clarification... ... but it does not wipe away my doubts. Probably nobody has appointed Romanoffia, but THIS do actually seem the post of a judge. Of course, that's unless anyone can accept and docket cases, here in TNP. Aside that... well, when you see someone...

I had sworn I would have stayed away of this mess, just looking at it. But now... men, may I just ask ONE question? Everyone here cries democracy has been betrayed, Matt is a backstabbing pig and so on and on... and then? What do you do? You create a process thread... a process where the one...