Search results

  1. Limerick1

    The North Pacific Pocket Constibillocode

    Great cause, lets keep it going!
  2. Limerick1

    ABC... What comes next?

    Y
  3. Limerick1

    Bootsie's Security Council Application

    I support bootsies admittance as long as there are no absences without warning.
  4. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    Correct, my argument is not with the the constitution being supreme, it is solely with the fact that this court procedures exerpt seems redundant and should probably be changed to correspond with the constitutions interpretation. While it wouldn’t change how it is applied, it would reduce...
  5. Limerick1

    Admin Requests

    Looking for re masking http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7019276/36/#new
  6. Limerick1

    ABC... What comes next?

    T
  7. Limerick1

    Oaths of Office

    I, Limerick1, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as justice, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal, responsible, and...
  8. Limerick1

    Results: May 2018 Special Justice Election

    Thank you everyone!
  9. Limerick1

    Goodbye + Resignation

    Thank you for all the work you’ve put in, I hope stuff gets better and you are able to return. Until then we will miss you and I wish you the best!
  10. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    Hello everyone, I cannot thank everyone enough. Today the voting is over, but my campaign is not. I will always be open to questions surrounding my interpretation of cases (that are already decided) as well as our laws. Thank everyone for their questions and I hope everyone has a great day. I...
  11. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    I don’t agree with that interpretation. “Any Justice may accept or deny a request for review, at their discretion.” Says that the justices have discretion on what cases to accept. This isn’t just procedural as it affects the case before it is accepted and determines whether or not cases must be...
  12. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    I have read them and continue to read them as stated in my response to abc
  13. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    i answered this question in abc's post. If you are refering to my previous post, the contradictory statements within the constitution and court procedure
  14. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    as would i, however it seems that our legal documents have conflicting beliefs on this
  15. Limerick1

    New 1

    HELLO!
  16. Limerick1

    Voting: May 2018 Special Justice Election

    Court Justice: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >
  17. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    Very sorry for my misunderstanding of what you were asking. I can see how this article would limit the jurisdiction of the court. Only being able to review ambiguities in law. I do think in this case it would fatal under legality of government policy by request of affected party. Personally I...
  18. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    No the court does not have the authority to set its own rules, but the central question in the case is clearly answered in the court procedures being that the court does have the authority to accept or deny reviews in its discretion. But was the constitution overules the court, of the ra were to...
  19. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    The question of whether or not a justice has the discretion to accept or deny a request is stated within the court procedures. “Any Justice may accept or deny a request for review, at their discretion. The Justice who accepts a request for review will become its Moderating Justice.“ This is...
  20. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    To preface, im going to make my analysis of these rather brief in the interest of saving the readers time, if you have further questions or wish that i deliberate further feel free to ask Request for Review: the ability of the RA to violate the sovereignty of residents...
  21. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    On Standing and the Definition of Affected Party- The court took the correct action in this case. I don't believe there are many people who will object to the ruling. The petitioner made a strong case in the Request for Review enumerating the reasons they were an "affected party" as well as the...
  22. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    I have taken some time to familiarize myself with the opinions of the court. An opinion that i thought was wise would be demonstrated with "On Leaving a Candidates Name off the Ballot". My reasoning being that even though the situation was addressed by government officials, a precedent was not...
  23. Limerick1

    Candidacy Declarations: May 2018 Special Justice Election

    Conflict of interest perhaps :)
  24. Limerick1

    Limerick1 Special Election

    Well starting off just to preface, no matter how i personally feel about the practice of pre-setting minimums or maximums, it is ultimately up to the Regional Assembly to control how much discretion justices are extended. Now onto the question you actually asked. My views are relatively similar...
  25. Limerick1

    Introduction

    Hello and welcome!
Back
Top