Search results

2

I'm fine with Viv.

The Court has selected me as Chief Justice for the July 2022 term.

I will take that to be the majority required and will post today that I will continue to serve as Chief. The matter of the Bar Commission is two fold. The Court is responsible for picking two commissioners. One is a Justice that the Court chooses among itself while the other is a citizen the...

I definitely want to continue to be in the spot.

I'm interested in serving as Chief. I am indifferent to the Bar Commission. I have no particular interest to serve as a Commissioner but I will help where I can.

I, Kronos, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Justice, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal, responsible, and...

Thanks so much! :D

When I think of “evaluation” as the law says I think of a test, like a Bar Exam. That’s a common method for testing legal knowledge. An exam can have questions based on the laws that must be covered per the Act and be made in a multiple choice, true or false, fill in the blank and/or short...

It depends on the circumstance from my perspective. The Bar Commission when it is formed will be tasked with measuring eligibility for Bar membership. In that specific case it will be on the Bar Commission to provide interested persons with the recommended or required qualifications and to also...

Thank you for the kind remarks and the questions! I feel universal standing is beneficial for the Court. I don't think universal standing needed to come back for R4Rs in a general sense. The R4Rs I participated in this term had enough to be accepted without it. But I do believe that universal...

Hmm, that is a tricky one. Every candidate in the running has been on the Court before so they each have experience. From that perspective each candidate is qualified. Some of the candidates may have more time served on the Court than others, but whether or not that makes them more qualified is...

I do not intend to seek selection as the Justice Bar Commissioner. I did not wholly agree with the Bar Act; I voted against it. The Bar Act was passed by the RA though and is now the letter of the law so as a Justice I have a duty to care for it which I will fulfill gladly. But if other Justices...

Some of my greatest challenges so far have been my level of patience and overthinking what others think about my performance. For example Court Rules and Procedures Chapter 2.8 says the Court will endeavor to reach an opinion for an R4R within 14 days after the period for briefs close. Simply...

Hey everyone, it's me again! My first term as a Justice was an amazing experience. It was a surreal experience that I want to continue pursuing. Being a Justice has been the most fun I have had with NS law in recent memory. The amount of case law there is to read, and the amount I read during...

Speaker: < St. George > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

I nominate @TlomzKrano

I accept my nomination.

Five Hundred and Thirty Eight

5807 trees

2

Ruling of the Court of The North Pacific On the Ability of the Speaker to Retract Citizenship Opinion drafted by Chief Justice Kronos, joined by Justices Sil Dorsett and Lord Dominator The Court took into consideration the inquiry filed here by Fregerson. The Court took into consideration the...

1

933

Preferred Nickname: Kronos Preferred Rainbow Color (Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Purple): Green!

Evangelical

I am joining in support of recalling the Speaker. I have held back from openly speaking on the recall to not compromise my position in the R4R that just concluded since it involved the Speaker and their office. With the opinion officially issued there is a bone I wish to pick. Since becoming a...

Awesome! I went through and did a final grammar sweep and I am also good with how it looks. Moderating Justice is good to post the opinion when they are able. Wonderful job everyone!

Alright I made hopefully the final edits to the draft. One more read through and we should be good to go.

Yeah that is mostly what I was implying my reasoning is because Permanence is one of the only examples of case law on good faith. The situation in that case seems very similar to this one with noticeable differences. And with the Court explaining how the nation had acted in good faith for four...