Search results

I don’t really give a hoot, if you want it that’s cool

@Attempted Socialism I am fine with lengthening the period per Dreadton’s request, I also would suggest we appoint MJ as the THO - both because he’s very likely to win, and because I find it amusing to do so in that manner.

@Attempted Socialism allowance of briefs is to my mind fine, the principal reason for waiting being the necessity of having 3 & allowing the new third to participate how they want.

Given that Dreadon’s resignation drops us to two, I believe we need to (per Constitution defining the Court as having 3 and also general good practice) have the R4R run at least until sometime after the special election finishes.

Sounds good to me

Against - useless proposal in itself

For

Agains, feels both too weak in clauses and insufficient for the task at hand

Agains, given the lack of coverage for mutual-defense treaties apparently

For - looks quite good to me, covers all the important bases that I can think of

For

For - while the absence of true compelling of addicts to these services isn’t great, the rest is.

I, Lord Dominator, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Bar Commissioner, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal...

Nation in TNP: Lady Raven Wing WA Nation (if different): I Came I Saw I Dominated, R/D Discord Tag: Lord Dominator#2860 Resolutions Authored (if any): 2 GA/5 SC Have you read the opening address: Yes WA Area of Focus: Both Any other message/comments: N/A

Against

While appreciated, I will decline

Entirely fair, no other comments to impede my support then

My only extant thought is still that the treaty definition should accommodate treaties with entities other than regions (that is, multi-regional orgs where we’re not having a treaty with every region at once ala the old FRA). I’m not saying we will at any point, but it seems prudent to allow for...

Gotcha

I do believe I have to do that, and I intended to wait a few more hours to make sure we get a reasonable amount of people able to comment on this if they want.

Amended to processed dependent on site access No need, edits take mere minutes

Done, with use of “usable” to incorporate the obvious need

Basically: any language/format issues (we don’t appear to have a format for these) or other NS-dependent processes we should include?

In consideration that NS isn’t expected to be up again until around the New Year and we have time & NS dependent activity, I present the following binding emergency declaration per section 8.1 of the Legal Code to be motioned following a short and prompt discussion to get the language right:

On those notes, I would direct your attention to this post here by Kenmoria indicating intent to submit (their high-quality) replacement for #2, as otherwise linked in this thread upon passage/near passage of this repeal (as a replacement is necessarily going to duplicate much of the mandates...

I generally oppose Libertations by default (in part because my single vote is unlikely to be a deciding factor)

Against

Looks good to me, can’t think of anything right now that removing the specifically would change. My only possible suggestion would be to accommodate the possibility of treaties with organizations (multi-regional or non-regional), though I will admit that is not particularly a concern at present...

Alveris Dispatch What’s the Future of the National Fund? Dost Senturk January 13th 2000 In all the hullabaloo of the new millennium, not many have noticed one of the few laws the National Congress passed in the last few weeks of this term. On December 20th, the National Investment Fund...

Luckily there is such a replacement: https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=455649