Search results

Hello, Blue Wolf here. You should vote for me as Justice in this Special Election because Elu said he was going to post a campaign thread and he didn't. I will be taking no questions.

Against. NPA.

I accept.

I'm not convinced that the introduction of F/S has become so detrimental and burdensome upon all departments of our region that we can't push through a quick confirmation vote on self-appointments on the three departments that this proposal applies to. That argument does not feel very well...

Holy text wall. Well, for those who are claiming that this is "just more red tape", I'm failing to see how. There have only ever been three self-appointments in TNP history, so even if this law had somehow magically been in effect since the begining we'd have a total of...three votes. In 14...

If the intent was to block any Delegate from self-appointments, the bill would have said that, and it doesn't. The intent is for the Regional Assembly to have a simply majority vote confirming the position, just like we currently have should a Delegate ever try to self-appoint themselves to a...

Attacking the author and not the content isn't conduct becoming of a Delegate. Please stay focused. In any case, the Delegate rules with the consent of the Regional Assembly. The entire point of the Mandatory Ministries acts in the first place was to 1) establish vital and necessary departments...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with having more oversight and accountability, especially when self-appoints had been exceptionally rare in the past but are now being used with increasing frequency. Self appointments are going from "in a pinch", very rare events to increasingly the standard...

I propose a minor fix to Section 7.5: Mandatory Ministries, 7.5.45 which reads with my proposed changes as follows: This minor change allows the Regional Assembly to vote any time a Delegate appoints themselves as an EO to one of the Mandatory Ministries rather than only being allowed to vote...

I'm convinced he has more fingers than he does posts in the past year. Perhaps that's good enough.

I second the motion to vote.

If you're this hostile over such a simple line of questioning, one which is pretty relevant given that the job requires a minimum level of activity and attention, then I'm not sure you're a very good fit.

That's only your fifth post in two months. You're barely above minimum activity levels to maintain citizenship.

Why NES? He hasn't been particularly active.

Have fun in Morocco!

He really does too

I announce my candidacy.

It is what it is

1

28

After consultation with the author, I motion for a vote.

I appreciate my title, but I'd prefer the delegate not pretend I wasn't a LT when Ied those operations and not the rank he demoted me to afterwards. I'll gladly trade in my honorary title for my prior rank, especially since I'm not longer allowed to lead the sort of operations I'm being...

Yeah, that's the point, the delegate shouldn't be able to ignore the intent of the law and appoint themselves just because they don't like that they have to appoint someone else to a Ministry and would rather hog control for themselves. It's bad organizationally, it's bad for activity, it's bad...

Ah, we're finding legal loopholes. Not a bad point, let me update the draft to close that loophole.

That's for someone else to plan now.

Closing embassies with TNP allies, excessively banning nations in regions we're not refounding, establishing embassies with designated enemy regions, general violations of variously already established NS rules. The normal things most Feeder militaries who trust their troops stick to.

The North Pacific has never really been put in a position where the Delegate had to take over one of the Mandatory Ministries, most of which used to be elected by the Regional Assembly back in the day as GBM recently reminded me. This current Delegate is the first Delegate who wasn't facing an...