Search results

Considering the Security Council partly exists to prevent potential rogue Delegates from accumulating power, that's an extremely valid belief. I fail to see what the issue is, that belief should be uncontroversial within the Security Council and it deeply concerns me that this current Council...

Are you open to bringing more transparency and accountability to the Security Council?

7

5

24

1

Delegate: < Ephyra Em > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Voopmont > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Speaker: 1. < Meteturan > 2. < Ayuzh > 3. < Ruby > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

RON hates that you said that.

Hopefully they're not using TCB's definition of Fascist or else no one who isn't a devout Stalinist is getting in. :P

What is your response to the accusations levied against you by your opponent in this race, RON?

I'll ask the obvious question. Why should we reaccept someone in our security apparatus who can't be bothered to show the bare minimum amount of activity required for citizenship?

I nominate @Petronellania, @Meteturan, and @Ayuzh for Speaker.

Nation in The North Pacific: Blue Wolf II Ministry you are interested in joining: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Optional) Previous experience: Three times prior Delegate of The North Pacific. Eight times prior Delegate of Lazarus. Former member of TNP Diplomatic Corp. Discord Username (if...

Order of Thel D'Ran?

I like the idea, but "Medal of Honor" sounds too American. Perhaps something more TNP themed.

7

8

It's about time. Full support.

Should it please the Court: As pointed out, Ruling 16. On the Speaker's Power to End Debate, did give broad "virtually unlimited discretion" for the Speaker to unilaterally end debates. However, Ruling 39. On the Use of the Speaker's Power to End Debate, then somewhat curtailed this unlimited...

Given the continuous threats the Delegate has made over Discord against people making arguments he believes are "classified", a nebulous definition he refuses to clarify , I seek legal remedy from the Courts. What guarantees do we have that any legal briefs being made in good faith will not be...

Including areas which probably are being used for government purposes but their creators super insist aren't? What would you consider the burden of proof for what is or is not within the laws purview?

Court Justice: 1. < Bharat > 2. < Lord Dominator > 3. < Skaraborg > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Is it your belief that our laws do not apply to areas which have been deemed "nongovernmental" by their creator, whomever that creator might be, but are being using for IC purposes? Why or why not?

Is it your belief that our laws do not apply to areas which have been deemed "nongovernmental" by their creators, whomever that creator might be, but are being using for IC purposes? Why or why not?

I second @Mall

Is it your belief that our laws do not apply to areas which have been deemed "nongovernmental" but their creators but are being using for IC purposes? Why or why not?

I nominate @Ruby, @North Norda Islands (NNI), @Simone, @Fish.

Do you believe that Justices proposing and pushing for new criminal laws while serving on the bench could be viewed as a conflict of interests?

Is it your belief that our Treason and Sedation laws do not apply to areas which have been deemed "nongovernmental" but are being using for IC purposes? Why or why not?

¿Por qué no los dos?