Search results

He will return again. Halleluiah!

Justice: 1. < Eluvatar > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

I find all this objectionable.

I'm not really seeing anything more extreme than the usual bickering, sniping, and sarcasm robust debate.

I feel fine. Thanks for asking! Why do you think you are feeling tense? Is there something we all can change or improve to help you feel a little better?

Twenty-one years ago today, I woke up to the sound of the bells of freedom ringing in The North Pacific. We were liberated! Great Bight’s coup had ended. To really understand what happened, you have to know something about the times we lived in. The drama went beyond simple game mechanics. In...

It's a conspiracy and a cover-up, I tell you. The truth will out!

It wouldn't be the first time I was banned by tyrants. Do your worst. I dare you.

Try and obfuscate that which we all know to be true. We shall not stand for it! Soon the region will find out about the lies, the cover-ups, the "highly classified" trash-talk. You know of what I speak.

In another age, RMB messages scrolled off and were lost to the aether. Not so today. This post reads "Post by PAnon 13 suppressed by Halsoni."

I want to know why Halsoni suppressed PAnon 13's RMB post. What is he hiding?

Justice: 1. < Sil Dorsett > 2. < Skaraborg > 3. < Gorundu > 4. < Lord Dominator > 5. < Vivanco > 6. < Comfed >

I want to address the "talent bench." It is very important for our existence as a premier region. Mentoring and developing newer members is key. Yet there is a limit to how long players will enjoy sitting on the bench. Term limits provide a legal foundation which supports the ambitions of newer...

For

Thank you for the nomination, but I shall have to decline.

There was a similar proposal made here: I Love McMasterdonia Do we think the third time might be the charm? Personally, I don't care to place more power in the executive branch of our government. Over the years there have been many attempts (some successful) which have served to shift the...

I'm not understanding your position. In what way are commends damaging to the WA? What sort of problems could arise? For

Justice: 1. < Vivanco > 2. < Gorundu > 3. < Lord Dominator > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

@Paxiosolange and @Holy Agrotasia both pass the admin check.

@Koopa103 passes the admin check.

I nominate @mcmasterdonia

Thank you for the nomination, but I shall have to decline.

Not to be gnomophobic, but I too am against.

@Demonos @Kenerkz @Faralried and @Attempted Socialism pass the admin check.

@MaoZedongThought belatedly passes the admin check.

We shall not be airing our differences here. Maybe you two should get a cup of coffee and talk it over. Thread locked.

One might ask how those fascist regions could "help" us. But that would be an easy way to bait you into saying something inappropriate, wouldn't it?

Oh, I don't have any judgement as to fairness or unfairness. The speaker's office can organize itself how the speaker best sees fit. As I see it, it is comparative to the SC's LoS. It provides a structure, it's there when you want it, and it gives clarity to everyone.

I read it as tenure being continuous and not cumulative. For example, DS1 was appointed 30 days ago. DS2 was appointed last week, after a 2 month hiatus. DS2 previously served for 6 years. According to the new rule, DS1 gets the nod.

Against