Search results

I wouldn't necessarily support any amendment that names individual people - that's probably beneath this place, to be honest (though the law that added this to the constitution was called the Boston Amendment, unfortunately). Government Official Reform Bill would work. As would any number of...

I agree with this. I'm against this currently just due to the name. Come up with something better please.

Non-WA for

"It is a position grounded in foreign affairs" - this is true. Not realities, but choices. "and concerns about the resolution's design" - this isn't true and did not come up until people started pointing out the FA choices being made.

Unfortunately the delegate has decided that the interests of a small number of our allies outweighs both the forum and in-game vote. It's a shame, especially as those allies won't be bringing alternative legislation (the problem with this resolution is the author, allegedly), instead choosing to...

Vice Delegate: < Orange > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

Aces, this resolves any concerns I might've had. I will be voting for the nominee.

Given that we've elected coupers to the delegacy and allow Whole India on the discord, I'm not particularly concerned about Ambis's past with BoM. I would like to ask Ambis about their history in Thaecia, however, and whether they were part of that whole "Xernon WA multies to fix an election"...

Court Justice: 1. < Blue Wolf II > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

Non-WA against so don't count it obviously. Repealing this commend without any kind of plan for a replacement condemnation is just letting certain regions attack a TNPer for very little reason for ourselves. And I find the arguments around Lazarus, made by the authors who previously exploited...

1

Against this, it's being done as an attack on the current delegate, in a way that looks increasingly distasteful given the pressures the government and region are currently experiencing.

Can the government provide a short statement, either in this topic or subforum or to the Regional Assembly, on why we're closing embassies with The Pacific? Thanks in advance.

Thank you, these replies adequately answer any concerns I had. Looking forward to voting for this when it gets to vote.

I would object to a vote being scheduled at this time, given how it's barely 8 hours since the discussion started, though I'm not against the nomination - I'm keeping an open mind. I know NES to be a competent and able administrator and would likely be no worse than any current commissioner -...

I decline my nomination.

I can only speak to what I saw as Delegate and a government minister but the assertion that Nimarya was not opposed by the old guard is not one that matches up with my recollections. I won't say more because it was a relatively long time ago now and I'd much rather the NPA focus on the future...

I object to the scheduling of the vote.

I appear to still have the ability to manage the Communications joinable group. I imagine this should probably be removed.

I think I'd be more comfortable with longer terms than shorter ones, but in general I'm in favour of this proposal I think and will probably support it (or at least, not vote against) at vote if it isn't changed to match my preferences.

My only worry with this bill is that making the official responsible for potentially prosecuting the delegate beholden to the delegate for appointment and re-appointment you run the risk of that official holding off on doing so so they don't risk not being re-appointed. You've tried to reduce...

Once formal debate ends and a vote is scheduled, I intend to object to the scheduling of a vote.

Nation: Gotmark Admit Ostmark as a member?: < Aye >

Delegate: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Vice Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Speaker: < Foskeburg > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Against due to the name, otherwise in support. Yes, I am zero fun at parties.

No.

Former multi-term Speaker here. I was never hamstrung by the two legislative vote limit and it was never a problem. Spreading out votes across a longer period of time encourages good legislative practice anyway.

Against this, I don't think there's a clear benefit to changing how things work right now and I'd rather not overburden the Speakers Office with having to track and count a great many legislative votes at any one time.

Hype

As someone who heavily pushed for declassification at various times, it's clear that that was a mistake and rather than improving transparency, it's just become a bureaucratic millstone around the neck of the executive. Full support.