Search results

  1. Wymondham

    The North Pacific v. KEKISTON, GrandEngland

    The court has appointed me moderating justice and I note the prosecution's withdrawal of the charges. In accordance with Chapter 3, Articles 23 and 24 of the Legal Code, I am notifying @St George of this, meaning they have seven days to either request that another prosecutor be selected or...
  2. Wymondham

    [Private] KEKISTON, GrandEngland indictment

    Seeing as charges have been dropped. Is everyone ok if we make me moderating justice simply so I can formally close the case? @Eluvatar @Lord Dominator
  3. Wymondham

    [Private] R4R Regarding "On the Need for Further Clarification on Restarting Voting Periods"

    Looks like we've got a new R4R from the Court Examiner. Anyone fancy being moderating justice?
  4. Wymondham

    [Private] Chief Justice

    I'd be in favour of Lore or Ghost. What say you @Lord Dominator
  5. Wymondham

    Court Bulletin Board & General Information

    The court has unanimously elected me as Chief Justice for the coming term.
  6. Wymondham

    [Private] Full Discord Logs July 11 2023 - November 11 2023

    Pallaith, Just a Minister — 09/08/2023 15:03 That was a good reminder of why doing forum stuff on mobile is terrible. Got one out but the rest will have to wait for when I get home Pallaith, Just a Minister — 09/08/2023 21:03 @Court I have updated the rulings thread and have entries for the four...
  7. Wymondham

    [Private] Chief Justice

    Ok. @Lord Dominator @Eluvatar which one of you would like to be our Bar Commissioner appointment?
  8. Wymondham

    [Private] Chief Justice

    Do we want to hold a formal vote or do y'all feel the above posts will suffice?
  9. Wymondham

    [SC, defeated] - Condemn Tinhampton

    Against (Non-WA)
  10. Wymondham

    [Private] KEKISTON, GrandEngland indictment

    Regarding this case, who would we like to take over as moderating justice?
  11. Wymondham

    [Private] Chief Justice

    I'd like to give it a go, but if either you or LD want it then I will gladly step aside in favour of the more senior justices?
  12. Wymondham

    Oaths of Office

    I, Wymondham, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Justice, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal, responsible, and...
  13. Wymondham

    [Chambers] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    Looks good to me! With that added in it looks good to go as far as I'm concerned.
  14. Wymondham

    [Chambers] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    I would just add something along the lines of: Thoughts?
  15. Wymondham

    Admin Requests

    Per this post can @Just a Lore be given the appropriate subforum access.
  16. Wymondham

    The North Pacific v. KEKISTON, GrandEngland

    The court has appointed @Just a Lore as Standby Hearing Officer in place of Simone. Lore, please take your oath.
  17. Wymondham

    [R4R] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    The court has appointed @Just a Lore as Temporary Hearing Officer in place of Simone. Lore, please take your oath.
  18. Wymondham

    [Chambers] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    The opinion looks good to me. I'd prefer a slightly more forceful condemnation of Dreadton's conduct if you're willing to give one, but that's window dressing. Lore has accepted and I will be announcing them shortly
  19. Wymondham

    [Chambers] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    Sure, I'm going to reach out to Lore as a first approach, is the accepted practice to go about it via discord DM or forum PM?
  20. Wymondham

    [Chambers] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    I would append it on the end, I'm happy to suggest some wording if you don't have any, but are we aiming that specifically at dreadton or making more generalised comments? The rest looks good to me.
  21. Wymondham

    [Chambers] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    @Eluvatar With voting on the next court closing on Saturday, how quickly do you think you can have that draft done?
  22. Wymondham

    Wym for Justice 2: Electric Boogaloo

    The court's role, quite simply is to "try all criminal cases and review the constitutionality of laws or legality of government policies and actions". The former point is quite self-explanatory, but the latter two are where I take a narrow interpretation of the Court's powers. On...
  23. Wymondham

    Wym for Justice 2: Electric Boogaloo

    My fellow North Pacificans. I am once again asking for your electoral support to become a Court Justice! To those who do not yet know me, Hello! I am Wymondham, but please call me Wym. I am running for another term as Court Justice after stepping up to the plate in a special election we had a...
  24. Wymondham

    [Private] Court reforms

    I concur with Elu
  25. Wymondham

    [Chambers] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    I am largely in accord with you here Elu, Vivanco presents the neatest solution to this problem and makes a fair case that the court cannot be in Schrodinger's evidence submission. . While I agree that this isn't the time to address contempt sanctions (though I very much think that such a...
  26. Wymondham

    [Chambers] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    I'm largely in accord with this. That said, I think such a standard must be created as a matter of urgency and that the line needs to either be drawn in the opinion (by granting the request for review and then establishing such a standard in the opinion) or in a procedures amendment pretty soon...
  27. Wymondham

    [Chambers] On the Improper Acceptance of Evidence in Criminal Trials

    I'm interested to see what you have to say on this before submitting my own comments
Back
Top