Search results

I have noticed on the drafting thread and in my TGs, people seem to have this idea that supporting this resolution means opposing any and all use of AI, and that isn’t the case. Personal use and assistive tools are not what is at issue here. This declaration is concerned with a very specific...

Speaker: Meteturan Would you like to reopen nominations? No

Gross misconduct is trying to do too much. My approach here is to aim for more specific crimes that can be applied to best fit situations. Gross misconduct is a blunt instrument and a catch all and as a result, it has to have the widest array of possible punishments to cover all scenarios, but...

I move for a vote. @St George

He’s asking you that because those are types of days in our law, in the cultural section. He wanted to know if you were aware of that and what impact they might have on your job as Speaker. You should refresh yourself on that concept and that may reveal why he felt this was relevant to the job...

No thanks, I am happy where I am.

The briefing period is closed, and the Court is now deliberating.

It wouldn't replicate the problem because it's a minor crime with reduced punishment. We expanded the menu, so to speak, so that a more specific and appropriate crime can be utilized. I expect forswearing would be most useful as a crime to charge non-government officials with, because government...

The briefing period is closed, and the Court is now deliberating.

I’m not sure I feel the disclaimer is necessary but I know better than to leave a potential stumbling point unaddressed. It’s a bit clunky for my liking but having failed to wordsmith it into something that feels better, I must conclude it gets the job done and should accomplish the aim without...

The Court accepts this request for review, and I will serve as the Moderating Justice. The Court does not recognize a respondent. At this time the Court will accept briefs from any interested party, until five days from this post.

The list naming every impacted region is the only place in our law that chronicles them, otherwise you have to rely on sifting through our treaties. I agree that you could simply specify all allies or enemies, but I think there’s value in having the list.

They did get what they voted for. And if they vote for this new bill, they will get what that entails too. Feel free to vote against this one if you like the duplicate language so much.

The Court accepts this request for review, and I will serve as the Moderating Justice. The Court does not recognize a respondent. At this time the Court will accept briefs from any interested party, until five days from this post.

I believe the list being elsewhere in the code is not a big deal. The law is clear, ignorance of the law is typically not an excuse. The scenario you outlined for intrusion would constitute intentional acts. Your understanding of ow this works is in fact how it works. As I said before, I can...

Ruling of the Court of The North Pacific On Counting Forum Posts Opinion drafted by Justice Skaraborg, joined by THO Chipoli, with Chief Justice Pallaith dissenting The Court took into consideration the inquiry filed here by TlomzKrano. The Court took into consideration the legal brief filed...

Dissent from the Ruling of the Court of The North Pacific In regards to the Judicial Inquiry filed by TlomzKrano on Counting Forum Posts Opinion drafted by Chief Justice Pallaith I dissent as follows: This Court was asked to decide an ambiguous part of our legal code, coming down on one side...

Precisely.

There are more scenarios than just that one. We ask your patience a bit longer, this isn’t exactly an urgent question regardless.

Sometimes that isn't possible, but what I can say is that just as I indicated in my previous update on this matter, we are close to being able to release a decision.

Did you happen to keep up with the personnel changes in the Court during this term? I think this might provide your answer.

I’m not quite sure how the roles and permissions work in this case but please be sure to mask @Chipoli as a temporary hearing officer per this appointment and his oath and make sure he can access the appropriate areas to fulfill that role. Thanks!

The Court has selected @Chipoli as Temporary Hearing Officer to fill the vacancy left by Eluvatar who has lost citizenship and therefore vacated his office again.

Can the Regional Bar subforum be archived to the Legal Records Archive as a subforum there, per the amendment of the law to discontinue the regional bar? Thank you!

This is super belated for an update, but the Court is approaching a response to this question. Getting everyone's schedules to line up has been difficult, but I believe we are fairly close to an answer.

@Halsoni Mr. Delegate, when Tlomz vacated office last week, he had been occupying three positions, one of which he has since resumed. The other two were security councillor and court examiner. He has seen fit not to reapply to the SC, but no word was given as to the position of court examiner...

I just want to say I’m glad Cretox found a way to reinvent the mold on GA proposals and that I could be a big part in executing that alternative vision. It’s a shame this innovation came so late in the lifetime of the General Assembly but it’s nice to see it pioneered ahead of a big time of...

No. I think this requires something similar to the third clause in espionage, which would specify gathering the info from The North Pacific. It was intended to be an internal thing, not have foreign policy implications. Good catch.

It is. No consideration given to the words "as appropriate" though I guess. Whatever, it's not worth the hassle, I have amended the draft to specify two clauses.

Walk me through the argument for precision. How would it be appropriate for the Speaker to update the preceding clause in any other way than what is intended? I can easily add the word “two” but I’m not seeing the argument here.