Search results

No thanks

Nominate @Pallaith

On anything that isn't legislation, a second is always necessary.

"Bad resolutions are good when they fit our purposes" is a garbage standard to hold ourselves, before even getting into the fact that these resolutions frequently prove entirely unnecessary and are quickly repealed. It's just badge hunting, except now it's just badge hunting with the most...

TNP last resolution: the resolution is sub-par and says nothing about TBH TNP this resolution: yes let's blindly follow the most generic trash resolution ever to hit the SC because we need libjuncts to even have a hope of winning on the battlefield This region should stop pretending to care...

Delegate: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Vice Delegate: < Sil Dorsett > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < AraFuttio > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

This would be much better for the Election Commission to deal with, especially if we eventually get into a situation where the make up of the EC makes UTC, for whatever reason, less appropriate to use.

The lack of endorsements on your nation is a concern. I seem to recall a similar lack of endorsements, and a long transitioon, during a previous delegacy of yours. I know from experience a lengthy transition can raise questions over competence both at home and abroad and put pressure on an...

Embarassing to see people lining to vote in favour of this.

I decline all my nominations but reserve the right to accept any nominations made in my name after this post.

Nicely done.

And then Robespierre ragequit the region.

I move this for a vote, and request a truncated formal debate period of three days.

Gonna give this today for any further feedback before moving into formal debate.

I have updated the draft with the changed wording.

Perhaps then something like: I'm not inclined to restrict the Speaker to always doing this and would prefer to allow the Speaker the leeway to use their judgement on such matters.

This feels awkwardly worded. Not sure how I'd fix it.

This bill is intended to amend the Regional Assembly Rules to allow a proposer to withdraw a proposal whilst it's at vote if some fatal flaw is discovered at that point rather than going through the rigmarole of a vote and then either resubmitting it or amending it at a later date. I think...

Mr Delegate, The Chief Justice Selection (Amendment) Bill has been passed by the Regional Assembly and is now presented for your signature or veto. If no action is taken by your office in seven (7) days, the legislation will become law.

This should be enough for the government to auto-against this.

This feels far too niche to be covered by the WA.

Which would apply to at least, at a conservative estimate, half a dozen channels that I know exist or existed that have never been archived. Given your close association both with the government over the last several years and the archival process, where are those archives? I don't believe the...

If this is the case, where are the archives of the all the channels in use in the Executive server? I'm not the Speaker, I'm asking as a citizen and deputy speaker.

Has Section 7.4.36 of the Legal Code been interpreted to apply to channels still in active use?

I am so fed up with people saying this. Fash, wherever they reside, must be opposed and it is always in TNP's interests to attack fascists. The RP community suffered zero negative affects from the raid and indeed, most people in it didn't even know it happened.

With a motion and a second recognised, a vote will start imminently.

Without wanting to weigh in on any specific questions, I will instead speak generally on TNP's government - whilst also recognising that there are potentially greater concerns around a free press at play here. The Ministers in TNP's government serve at the discretion of the delegate - the...

The following have failed to maintain a nation in TNP and will be remasked as a member: @Dalimbar @Kenmoria @Libaga

Perhaps they should've been paying attention?

It's now a week since you provided the mid-term address for Cabinet for look at and provide feedback, based on a comment you made in the Citizens chat, which you expected to post on the 12th. Can you provide an ETA on when it will posted or are you too busy with the WA GA?