Search results

I think accepting it is kind of a waste of time, but it's been long enough since the ruling that I think it's ok to bring it back up and talk it though.

We seem to be open to a switcheroo - @Dreadton to become the Court representative to the Bar Commission, and @Lord Dominator our nominee to the Regional Assembly. @Dreadton, @Pallaith thoughts? Comments? Rubber stamps?

Done

Under the ruling On the Reconsideration of the Jurisdiction of the Criminal Code, a crime must be committed either by one who was a citizen or resident at the time or be committed on TNP soil, which includes TNP's discord but does not logically include non-TNP chat. Therefore this indictment...

The ruling cited also has a section on crimes committed on TNP soil and lists the region's Discord server as part of that. It does not however list DMs or interregional coordination discords. I think you're both right that we have to decline the indictment and cite that ruling. I don't think we...

I don't think I have the time to pursue the position, and am gratified with how @Pallaith has done it in the past. Congratulations, Chief Justice @Pallaith !

I, @Eluvatar, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Justice, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal, responsible, and...

A quite belated thread, mainly in case anyone has questions they'd like to ask me before voting closes. My last full campaign retains a quite succinct precis of what I think is important about my role as Justice. Any questions people would like to ask me? Answering one question ahead of time...

Court Justice: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

That is better :D

I'll accept my nominations.

It seems weird to strike a ruling in its entirety when its central holding is still operative, even if effectuated now more explicitly by law. Is there any portion of the ruling we could strike instead, such as the outdated legal code references? (Apologies for missing this topic earlier)

One explanation for WA nations nearing that threshold is that relative endorsement levels have changed due to decline in WA population. Another is that the slow track process (with two+ warnings, further detailed in the SC procedures I think), which involves friendly contact with endorsement...

Why the change from having the vice delegate required endorsement level equal the fast track ejection threshold? I think the justification for the fast track threshold was to make sure the Vice Delegate does have the second most endorsements. This seems to shift us closer to a plain endorsement...

@Lord Nwahs won three times! Now count to forty seven.

@Ayuzh wins thrice, @Lord Nwahs twice, and @Petronellania once. Now count to forty six.

@Bankowiata , @Ayuzh, @Petronellania, and @Bankowiata won! Now count to forty five.