Search results

I have updated the draft with the changed wording.

Perhaps then something like: I'm not inclined to restrict the Speaker to always doing this and would prefer to allow the Speaker the leeway to use their judgement on such matters.

This feels awkwardly worded. Not sure how I'd fix it.

This bill is intended to amend the Regional Assembly Rules to allow a proposer to withdraw a proposal whilst it's at vote if some fatal flaw is discovered at that point rather than going through the rigmarole of a vote and then either resubmitting it or amending it at a later date. I think...

Mr Delegate, The Chief Justice Selection (Amendment) Bill has been passed by the Regional Assembly and is now presented for your signature or veto. If no action is taken by your office in seven (7) days, the legislation will become law.

This should be enough for the government to auto-against this.

This feels far too niche to be covered by the WA.

Which would apply to at least, at a conservative estimate, half a dozen channels that I know exist or existed that have never been archived. Given your close association both with the government over the last several years and the archival process, where are those archives? I don't believe the...

If this is the case, where are the archives of the all the channels in use in the Executive server? I'm not the Speaker, I'm asking as a citizen and deputy speaker.

Has Section 7.4.36 of the Legal Code been interpreted to apply to channels still in active use?

I am so fed up with people saying this. Fash, wherever they reside, must be opposed and it is always in TNP's interests to attack fascists. The RP community suffered zero negative affects from the raid and indeed, most people in it didn't even know it happened.

With a motion and a second recognised, a vote will start imminently.

Without wanting to weigh in on any specific questions, I will instead speak generally on TNP's government - whilst also recognising that there are potentially greater concerns around a free press at play here. The Ministers in TNP's government serve at the discretion of the delegate - the...

The following have failed to maintain a nation in TNP and will be remasked as a member: @Dalimbar @Kenmoria @Libaga

Perhaps they should've been paying attention?

It's now a week since you provided the mid-term address for Cabinet for look at and provide feedback, based on a comment you made in the Citizens chat, which you expected to post on the 12th. Can you provide an ETA on when it will posted or are you too busy with the WA GA?

Why does this need to be addressed by the GA?

This is yet another overreach by the GA.

I was asked to say a few words. I have nothing nice nor good to say about the direction TNP is heading, nor in the standard of candidate for high office it is currently generating, nor in the overall health of our democracy. So I will refrain from speaking.

I still don't see a need for legislating this - all of the supposed justifications for putting it in law can easily be worked around or are, respectfully, not actual problems. If authors can't write a preamble or come up with a justification for why a person should be recognised by the RA beyond...

If the RA wants to recognise someone, it can already do so, by passing a motion recognising them.

So establish one - you have the power. It doesn't need to be legislated on.

I don't see how a formal awards system, enshrined by law, is desirable in any way. It's one of those vapid Europeia-style things that leads to people recognised beyond their talent level or achievements because they did things the established regime liked, even if those things were objectively...

What is that other region and does that region have a discord server?

Get a job you weird guy.

This is garbage.

It's good to see you back in green, Bob.

Court Justice: 1. < Lord Dominator > 2. < Vivanco > 3. < Sir Kasto > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

The following have had their citizenship removed due to it being granted by mistake: @Gorutimania