Search results

For

Present

Present

I'm rather disappointed by the lack of comment, especially considering the nature of your initial response. I hope the double-post can be excused, considering the intervening timeframe.

Against Since barely anything has changed from the last submission, I'll copy my previous comments over:

Abstain

Against ...on the basis of a lack of replacement only; I will comment additionally that the lack of a forum draft is unfortunate.

Against I maintain that this is far too specific in many of its clauses, and many of these specifics are not particularly sensible. Some of the definitions are not great (quite a lot of things are "developed for consumption by a sapient species", and a fair few of those are not really...

I'm well familiar with this functionality, but that could hardly be called a "non-medical scenario"—perhaps "from being activated in cases where the device ought not to be used" would be better—and I had assumed that you meant the device had to somehow prevent (criminal) misuse for a non-medical...

Present I do not have the knowledge to make much useful judgement on this, nor the time to attempt it.

I don't believe that this is something that could be (or regardless ought to be) regulated by the GA. In addition to the concerns listed by Simone with regards to diplomatic immunity, there just generally exists a large amount of variation in how this is handled. Consider the hypothetical...

Against

Against I don't see why the GA shouldn't be able to legislate on topics such as these, but nonetheless feel it is something of a cowardly choice and nonetheless a proposal of rather little value.

Against Flaws listed above, plus some national reasons.

Present There are some minor drafting issues here that cause some issues (improper capitalisation being one, where "public spaces" could be interpreted as not referring to the defined "Public Spaces", etc.), as well as some questionably-implementable ("prevent the device from being activated...

For Aside from being a little overbearing, I can see no major issues.

Present

Present Whilst I do feel this is overreaching slightly, I don't have any major issues, aside from that 5.1 should be, in line with standard practice, "publish" (instead of "set"), and include a more general requirement for public commitment to publishing (as not doing so renders any standards...

Present

Against Serious flaws have been pointed out above, and I'd remain generally opposed to this kind of intervention by the WA (even with consent—yes, I've read the resolution) as a matter of national policy only.