Search results

I still maintain that the appropriate remedy for SC inactivity issues is suspension and not a new round of voting in the R.A. Unless there's a way to prevent such a process from being used as a political weapon, even when the SC member is question has done nothing to warrant removal which I...

I believe and have already suggested a much simpler solution to the remedy to inactivity removals from the Security Council. One should keep in mind that in the original contemplation of the SC's function, it was to operate in a manner so those residents of the region who met the influence and...

The lack of an explanation in the O.P. concerning the ID number was an oversight because it wasn't clear how that was to work. I voted publicly instead of privately because of the lack of clarity about the matter. If this device is ever used in the future, a much clearer explanation needs to be...

See title of thread. And also, shouldn't each office still list the option to abstain? I believe that right is constitutionally protected, and not showing it as an option throws any election into question.

Court Justice (select 3): < abstain | abstain | abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Attorney General: < abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

Of course you would. >|P I am sure the veterans of The North Pacific Confederation that are left would greatly support such a celebration.

One again Silly Strng, do not tewll me what to say or what to think, much less put words in my mouth. Please edit your post, or I shall report it for moderation. My objection to COE is a demonstrated incapacity in my views to work collegiality from what I have observed in the context of the...

All that has to be done is to use the feature that leaves a link in their current location. I'm mystified as to how those few threads went to the RA archives and not earlier elections as well. We haven't always had an elections area, so my guess is that these were somehow overlooked. It's also...

Speaker: Abstain Would you like to reopen nominations?: Yes

I want to make clear what I posted in the Delegate special elections nominations thread, I will not accept any nominations, or stand as a candidate, for any elective office in TNP now or in the future. Thank you.

I wish to announce that henceforward, I will not accept any nomination for any elective office in TNP, and I will not stand as a candidate. Last July, I made clear that I planned to retire from the Regional Assembly and thus, holding elected office on or about July 19th of this year. I mean it...

Court Justice: < abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >]

Nay

Because I have serious reservations about his ability to work collegially in the setting of the Security Council, and in view of a recent and ongoing discussion that I am not satisfied with, I cannot support this application.

One, I was not a party to the adoption of that specific procedure. Second, the security assessments are the responsibility of the Vice Delegate as Vice Delegate. The role of consultation with the Security Council does not require the individual members to do anything. It has nothing to do with...

Somwhow, Blue, you must have missed the Court decision that the Security Council is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act procedures. And as was noted in this thread, the procedure you and Aba discussed was only for his tenure as Vice Delegate. The Security Council has never approved...