Search results

I request Sanctaria recuse himself from these proceedings based on his comments on IRC. He clearly has a conflict of interest in this matter. [18:44] <+Sanctaria> I think I'll probably have to recuse myself after saying this [18:45] <+Sanctaria> but if the election was run properly [18:45]...

Can we keep this topic to my recall motion please?

That has already been done.

Nope. Your party will forever be "The Imperial Part of The North Pacific". :P Done.

Neither did I. DD: I expect you will also be seconding the other EC's motions for recalls? Or did I do something to you that is motivating this second?

Of course.

Out of curiosity why is this in the RA?

Who will determine these laws that need to be written and passed 30 days before the election? The EC's aren't announced till a week before elections.

Ah. I vaguely remember now. So much has happened since I joined TNP it seems like I have been here for years and stuff just kinda blurs together when in reality I have only been here for a little more than a year.

I honestly don't remember the circumstances around that. Without looking since you already did, did he state his declaration of candidacy in the nominations thread?

I really don't see the point in this until the Court gives their ruling. But I could support this if it went to vote.

The only person I remember last year was someone who wasn't an RA member for 15 days. I can't think of their name though.

Haven't you ever heard of duality? :P

However in this case the Legal Code establishes that Election Commissioners are to supervise and oversee elections. The Constitution also allows government bodies to create rules and procedures. Your argument here is extremely flawed.

I personally find the 5 hour time frame for submitting reviews on this matter insane. Today is mothers day and a Sunday. The tiemframe given by the Court started at 6:30am EST, which both Elu and I are in the EST timezone, and ending at 10:30am just 5 hours later is preposterous. I can't...

I as an election commissioner in the election wish to ask the Court to handle this matter with expedience as it directly relates to an ongoing election.

I as an election commissioner in the election wish to ask the Court to handle this matter with expedience as it directly relates to an ongoing election.

Well the only people who can delete posts on the forums are Admins. I do not believe you are able to use the FOIA law for admin actions. I would suggest you try. I nor to my knowledge did the other EC's see your post.

As I have stated in the other 2 threads you have commented on this in you never accepted or self nominated yourself.

The nomination thread didn't change. You didn't post your candidacy as such were not included on the ballot.

There was no self nomination on your part. You did not post your self nomination in the thread which was designated for nominations and self nominations.

He was.

I believe that is more of a legal question rather than a forum administration question.

Statement from the Cabinet of The South Pacific in regards to Relations with The West Pacific It is common knowledge that the relationship between The South Pacific and The West Pacific have been far form exemplary during the past few years.  It is also publicly known that the South Pacific has...

Statement from the Cabinet of the South Pacific in regards to Relations with The Pacific It is with great sadness that we are faced with the evaluation of relationships with regions we called friends while attempting to recover from the heinous actions of Milograd.  The Pacific has long been...

Noted and removed from the ballot.

Changing my vote to NAY.

Statement from the Cabinet of The Coalition of The South Pacific in regards to the end of the Milograd Coup and victory on the home front As of minor update today The South Pacific is once again free from foreign occupation and oppression, and NationState's oldest and most resilient democratic...

Yeah I won't be. I wish for the Court to still make a ruling on this matter.

Abstain.