Search results

Court Justice: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

If the EC is going to be adjusting the rules to ensure clarity in the future, this is unlikely to be necessary. I'll withdraw at this point.

My point and the point of the proposed legislation is that the intent of saying "I nominate myself" is to declare oneself as a candidate in almost all circumstances. The added step of accepting ones nomination feels unnecessary and this minor change should hopefully minimize confusion in the...

No, this edit is purely for self nominations as worded. The language that requires acceptance of nominations from other citizens remains unchanged.

I thought about that. It likely could go either way, but with how minor of a change it would be in the Legal Code and as that is where the legal definition of who is / is not a candidate resides, I opted to propose it this way.

For (EDIT: No longer has resident nation in TNP) - SR (2023-03-01)

Following the recent confusion regarding Rae's self-declaration of candidacy and the Election Commission's decision to deny their candidacy based on the wording of the self-nomination while acknowledging the need to clarify the self-nomination process, I propose the following adjustment to the...

For Well written and seems fairly simple, in a fine way.

I see no reason to delay further. I second the motion.

I agree with GBM's concerns and voice support for St. George's proposed expansion of the application processing timeline.

For I vote with the IFV as I am unfamiliar with those in question and trust the judgement of the team preparing the IFV.

Abstain I will likely vote with the IFV.

For

That is fine, then if @Gorundu is not formally motioning.

As their self-nomination may not hold up, I will nominate @Rae Also, I will join those in also nominating @Vivanco

I will second the motion.

I already voted for Hulldom for Delegate and fully support their inclusion on the SC. Strong support.

I am sorry to hear that. I hope you have a swift and complete recovery.

Tentatively For as well

I was about to say something similar about the fourth clause, but you said it better than I could have. Against.

4

Thanks for the responses so far. Just an FYI - neither of those actions require citizenship. Citizenship has specific responsibilities and benefits, but the biggest ones are voting rights for the regional government as well as further involvement in managing/organizing ministries. Do you have...

I guess I will start it off - what made you decide to apply for citizenship in The North Pacific, @Japhan ? Also, do you have the means of applying for citizenship via a residential IP?

The proposal has been modified to include more unique text than the original version. It also pushed the specifics of individual programs to individual Member States while establishing a few minimum guidelines for each program. Comments and thoughts appreciated.

I do not need to be attributed. The language is not mine, I just pointed out logistical issues with the original in the previous thread here.

This is my first World Assembly proposal and, as such, is definitely a work in progress. I want to create a more detailed set of asbestos regulations than the existing GA asbestos ones while replacing inaccurate language about asbestos. Suggestions are, of course, appreciated. (EDIT by Simone...

Asbestos Safety Act Pre-Submission Proposal Discussion Category: Environmental | Strength: All Businesses - Mild Proposed by: Namwenia, | Onsite Topic Internal Voting Instructions: Vote Support if you personally support this proposal in its current form. Vote Oppose if you personally oppose...

For My comments on the previous version appear to be addressed.

I am sorry for being so negative. I'm not trying to be, you just happened to touch on a topic I genuinely know about IRL. I really am supportive of the intent, I just want this to be clear. Even if we have to kick certain parts of this proposal to individual member nations to ensure it covers...

Environmental engineer IRL here. Raising my hands on a few things. Section 1 - Most nations, including the United States, refer to something as hazardous if it poses a threat to either human health or the environment. Emphasizing that sentient creature health can also be the reason to classify...