Search results

wait, are we meeting at all three of those times?

okay Tim

I am against, and have voted only in TNP so far.

Description: The Security Council, RECOGNIZING that The Quote of the Day (TQOTD) failed to deliver the "quotes of wisdom" in the days leading to the fall of the nation, POINTING OUT that many nations travel to regions to leave congratulations and greetings, and that TQOTD was not unique in...

I think that King could have handled it a lot better than by discounting someone's vote.

I think replacing IA with culture is a good idea. I think that the delegate shouldn't have the power to randomly sack a minister, it should be a full Co5 vote.

Elu Edit: Added MoWA Seal

Written by Cormac. Currently at Votes For: 690 (34%) Votes Against: 1,353 (66%) "Amongst The North Pacific residents, voting is currently 19-23 (54% Against)."

I don't really feel comfortable on this issue telling you how to vote. It has a lot to do with how you view the relationship between WA nations and between WA nations and the WA, and every nation has their own opinion. I couldn't really tell you whether one opinion is "right" or "wrong"...

tbh, it was clearly an interception and you called it a touchdown.

Just the dynamics of the group. But who knows.

the Council of Five is unlikely to adopt this motion. 'tis a fact.

in the United Kingdom a motion to table means a motion to bring up or discuss. Under that interpretation, I concur.

TNP Nation: Sexy Cars WA Nation: none Attorney General: Abbey Anumia

Punk and Cormac sum up their arguments nicely. :)

Because you're discriminating against citizens in a way that no other position does. Equality. Its not a hard concept.

Awesome. Thank you for the clarification, Cormac.

While the Council of Five has now voted to send their policy to debate on the RA, I would still like this ruling. It doesn't make sense for the RA to potentially pass an illegal resolution.

Should the Court issue a ruling which decrees the current Council of Five policy is legal, I will support this.

This amendment, is entirely silly. You seem to be attempting to find a problem when there isn't so much of one.

Yeah yeah whatever.

I would like to join. In case the OP ever gets changed to something weird or whatever, this is the OP at the time of this agreement.

I'd play. <-- Osiris champion :p

Do executive policies not count as laws? Are they not subject to the same constitutionality rules as laws? Simply because a policy was not challenged before does not mean that it should not be.

The Council of 5 has now adopted a policy requiring nations to either have their WA nation permanently in TNP or be a part of the regional army. I believe that this policy is illegal, having violated the following: as well as and I believe that this policy first off, by requiring nations...