Search results

The following complaints are made(with credible evidence supporting them): 1."The Speaker violated their Standing Procedures!" 2."The Speaker refused to give me citizenship! I passed both checks! This is outrageous!" 3."The Speaker is biased! I presented my wonderful bill and demanded the...

Well, we do have loopholes right now. What is your suggestion to close them?

Well, yes. You could only apply it to section 9.2. It is probably safer to keep this only for section 9.2. and make a seperate vote to change it for section 9.1 if that is actually wanted. And I just realized that it should be expanded to Article 1 and Article 7.14 of the Constitution for...

If I would be a witness, then I would not refer criminal cases to the court as AG... the same would apply for a government action and so on. But if I see a problem with normal laws violating the constitution? I would refer it to the court. It is better to do something before further damage...

I never said that appointed officials are constitutionally-mandated elected officials. They are not. However, if they carry out the duties of a constitutionally-mandated official position, and thus serve in that position, then that does apply to them. Even if they are not the...

Note: I am assuming that this, a bill, is a legislative proposal. If the number of citizens required to achieve quorum for a legislative vote is 6 or lower;or 9 or lower if the citizen introducing the proposal did not motion or do the second, then the Speaker has violated the Law and as such...

I'd still say it is not allowed. The constitution says that you may not serve in more than one of these positions. It does not simply say that you may not be elected into that position, a notable difference! A deputy AG acts in the name of the office, when instructed by the AG to do so. Thus...

Whenever they find something that violates the law. Or when someone expresses credible legal doubts no one acts on.

I do not know how much my inexperience would affect my abilities to perform the duties of AG. I think I might manage it by being careful, but that is just an assumption. I will take any complaints and requests for advice seriously and double-check that I am not giving bad advice or shutting down...

Hmm well not really. Deputies are an extension of an official position.

No. The Vice Delegate position is constitutionally mandated.

The Attorney General will only get active if there are legal concerns(if they are acting as advisor or prosecutor). Everything else is of no interest to the Attorney General. That means that there are no plans the AG can make(beyond appointing a deputy). The post of Attorney General is reactive...

I declared my candidacy for this post. Yes, I am new, and I have no experience. The Attorney General is not someone who shapes executive policy, like the Delegate or the Vice Delegate, which means that I have nothing more to say currently. So, if you have any questions, feel free to ask!

For

I declare my candidacy.

For. Fracking has no reasonable benefit. It extracts finite resources with bad environmental effects via toxic liquids. A broad ban is necessary.

Against. This still bans consensual sacrifice, which is not good. This bans nonconsensual sacrifice in the name of the society when there is public interest in doing so, during an immediately dangerous overpopulation period when all other things have been tried, and to stop corruption via random...

Present.

Speaker: < Darcania > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

I already drafted a proposal in the GA forums, ignored the advice of several experienced WA editors, and saw my proposal being shot down with less than 15% support. I want to do it better this time.

As you have mentioned the Attorney General, yes ok. It's ok. And yes I want to see this list of things wrong with the proposal.

You would surely make an announcement including why that proposal was illegal and expressing your regrets. Can you provide an example announcement? Did you take provision 4 of the Bill of Rights into account?

Your reactions uncovered a lack of (necessary) experience or at least knowledge. I cannot support you right now. Sorry. Maybe get some more training and try again? Your ideas on how to proceed are good.

Three/four scenarios: 1. An applicant made the oath. Admin check succeeds. The Vice Delegate says "Security problems found. Rejected." after 2 days. The Vice Delegate privately asks you not to hold a vote on them because they could not tell anyone why the application was denied, out of security...

The commendation seems to be valid in the terms of accomplishments, but it looks like a commendation trade, something that should not get encouraged. I vote Abstain because I think we should abstain, on this matter. Concerns have been addressed. Looks genuine For

Currently, this only affects nations who use vacation mode, and they can leave for up to 60 days maximum before they cease to exist and are removed anyways. This is an indirect cap to the leave of absence. I do not see a good reason to remove this.

Yes, that's it. Correct, it is. It's too restrictive. Hmmmm its a bit difficult to explain, but I'll try. Products are usually sold and produced in multiple countries, especially sold. Products and especially resources aren't produced or found equally in every state. Undesirable products being...

Against. This proposal legalizes desertion to an enemy with superior healthcare in wartime, and it does not contain an exception for prisoners(and the concerns in the MoWAA recommendation are valid, too).