Search results

That has its own problems, which were already discussed.

Against

The gap between your endorsements and the endorsements of the Delegate has been reduced further, to 41 endorsements, and shrinking. I ask you, the Vice Delegate, to do something to increase the gap a bit.

Fine. Ok. On an unrelated note, when will a vote be scheduled by the speaker?

In my opinion, there is no need for a seperate article.

The proposed amendment has been updated.

I'd like to propose some additional changes: And:

I voted against because I do not believe in Hydraulic Fracturing being anything but an attempt to extract and use even more non-renewable resources that should stay where they are, and because I believe that the money spent on Hydraulic Fracturing would be better spent elsewhere. Additionally...

Against

Nonwithstanding legal issues, I would not vote for it even if it would be or is legal. One reason is that you have not presented any credible arguments on how such changes would increase the ...

May I ask the Speaker why the concurrent motions to the emergency declaration have been instead treated as being one motion with the emergency declaration?

Yes, but... I like your changes on this matter. I think your arguments are sound. I changed it.

COE, do you think that I should change the text of the current proposal(currently in formal debate) to the text of the quoted proposal?

Attorney General: < Deropia > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

Further elaboration, as requested by the Court: Section 9.1. of the Legal Code authorizes the Assembly to enact any binding recommendations in emergency situations with majority vote, and it authorizes the Assembly to declare an emergency without any prerequisites, also with majority vote. Thus...

I expect integrity from the members of this Assembly. Trying to circumvent the protections of the Bill of Rights by declaring emergencies when no real emergencies exist is not even remotely an example of integrity, it is rather the complete opposite.

1. What law, government policy, or action (taken by a government official) do you request that the Court review? Chapter 9 of the Legal Code: 2. What portions of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Legal Code, or other legal document do you believe has been violated by the above? How so...

Attorney General: < James Urquhart > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

1. It is too late(unless nominations are reopened) 2.I have no experience in being an AG or anything similar. 3.Not all candidates looked like they were confident in being the best candidates. 4.If the first round would end with a reopening of nominations due to a lack of confidence of the...

This is one of the conclusions of the Court: As long as the court does not overturn this precedent, it will be binding upon the court.

Please inform me why you think that this Court ruling is not applicable(or not applicable anymore). Regardless of your answer, please tell me where you find the equivalent of the following clause from "Non-Legislative Proposal Procedure" in the other sections of the Standing Procedures:

Adopted, with minor changes. You are probably right about Article 7 Clause 14. I motion that the current proposal in the opening post(the old, spoilered drafts are not part of it), named Closing Legal Loopholes Amendment, should be put up to a vote in this Regional Assembly.

I am not satisfied with (some of) your answers. There might be some improbable scenarios, but some of them are definitely not implausible. Please clarify that statement. Which charges should be filed by an AG, and under which circumstances? Please back up your statement that the speaker is...

I have withdrawn my candidacy. I honestly believe that there are at least two candidates more suitable for the office than me. I see no good reason to uphold my candidacy with the possibility of being elected as less suitable alternative.

I withdraw my candidacy.

The following complaints are made(with credible evidence supporting them): 1."The Speaker violated their Standing Procedures!" 2."The Speaker refused to give me citizenship! I passed both checks! This is outrageous!" 3."The Speaker is biased! I presented my wonderful bill and demanded the...

The following complaints are made(with credible evidence supporting them): 1."The Speaker violated their Standing Procedures!" 2."The Speaker refused to give me citizenship! I passed both checks! This is outrageous!" 3."The Speaker is biased! I presented my wonderful bill and demanded the...

The following complaints are made(with credible evidence supporting them): 2."The Speaker refused to give me citizenship! I passed both checks! This is outrageous!" 3."The Speaker is biased! I presented my wonderful bill and demanded the speaker to bring it to vote ASAP, but they declined!"...